mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

An Analysis of Initial Training Strategies for Exemplar-Free Class-Incremental Learning

arXiv 2308.11677 ↗First posted 22 Aug 2023cs.LG cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Class-Incremental Learning (CIL) aims to build classification models from data streams. At each step of the CIL process, new classes must be integrated into the model. Due to catastrophic forgetting, CIL is particularly challenging when examples from past classes cannot be stored, the case on which we focus here. To date, most approaches are based exclusively on the target dataset of the CIL process. However, the use of models pre-trained in a self-supervised way on large amounts of data has recently gained momentum. The initial model of the CIL process may only use the first batch of the target dataset, or also use pre-trained weights obtained on an auxiliary dataset. The choice between these two initial learning strategies can significantly influence the performance of the incremental learning model, but has not yet been studied in depth. Performance is also influenced by the choice of the CIL algorithm, the neural architecture, the nature of the target task, the distribution of classes in the stream and the number of examples available for learning. We conduct a comprehensive experimental study to assess the roles of these factors. We present a statistical analysis framework that quantifies the relative contribution of each factor to incremental performance. Our main finding is that the initial training strategy is the dominant factor influencing the average incremental accuracy, but that the choice of CIL algorithm is more important in preventing forgetting. Based on this analysis, we propose practical recommendations for choosing the right initial training strategy for a given incremental learning use case. These recommendations are intended to facilitate the practical deployment of incremental learning.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 51 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2023.

Builds on

51 of 75 references.

References · 51

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,043
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,180
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,476
  5. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,857
  6. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,492
  7. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,730
  8. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,574
  9. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,479
  10. 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,323
  11. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,709
  12. 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,612
38 more
  1. 2018Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 1,322
  2. 2021Learning to Prompt for Continual Learningcited by 941
  3. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 732
  4. 2019Self-supervised Visual Feature Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 656
  5. 2019Three scenarios for continual learningcited by 612
  6. 2018End-to-End Incremental Learningcited by 597
  7. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 562
  8. 2014Learning Face Representation from Scratchcited by 453
  9. 2020Class-incremental learning: survey and performance evaluation on image classificationcited by 448
  10. 2018A Survey on Deep Transfer Learningcited by 417
  11. 2017A Neural Representation of Sketch Drawingscited by 311
  12. 2020Google Landmarks Dataset v2 -- A Large-Scale Benchmark for Instance-Level Recognition and Retrievalcited by 308
  13. 2021DyTox: Transformers for Continual Learning with DYnamic TOken eXpansioncited by 291
  14. 2016Large-Scale Image Retrieval with Attentive Deep Local Featurescited by 238
  15. 2018Generalisation in humans and deep neural networkscited by 237
  16. 2015Large-scale Classification of Fine-Art Paintings: Learning The Right Metric on The Right Featurecited by 182
  17. 2021Self-Supervised Models are Continual Learnerscited by 149
  18. 2022FeTrIL: Feature Translation for Exemplar-Free Class-Incremental Learningcited by 120
  19. 2019A continual learning survey: Defying forgetting in classification taskscited by 118
  20. 2022Self-Sustaining Representation Expansion for Non-Exemplar Class-Incremental Learningcited by 118
  21. 2020A Comprehensive Study of Class Incremental Learning Algorithms for Visual Taskscited by 107
  22. 2021Exploring the Limits of Large Scale Pre-trainingcited by 104
  23. 2019Lifelong Machine Learning with Deep Streaming Linear Discriminant Analysiscited by 92
  24. 2021Wide Neural Networks Forget Less Catastrophicallycited by 64
  25. 2022Continual Learning with Foundation Models: An Empirical Study of Latent Replaycited by 61
  26. 2022Class-Incremental Learning with Strong Pre-trained Modelscited by 60
  27. 2021Self-Supervised Training Enhances Online Continual Learningcited by 54
  28. 2022A Simple Baseline that Questions the Use of Pretrained-Models in Continual Learningcited by 54
  29. 2022Online Continual Learning for Embedded Devicescited by 49
  30. 2019Growing a Brain: Fine-Tuning by Increasing Model Capacitycited by 43
  31. 2022Can CNNs Be More Robust Than Transformers?cited by 38
  32. 2022An Impartial Take to the CNN vs Transformer Robustness Contestcited by 34
  33. 2018DeeSIL: Deep-Shallow Incremental Learningcited by 30
  34. 2019Logo-2K+: A Large-Scale Logo Dataset for Scalable Logo Classificationcited by 22
  35. 2023Kaizen: Practical Self-supervised Continual Learning with Continual Fine-tuningcited by 16
  36. 2021Balanced softmax cross-entropy for incremental learning with and without memorycited by 13
  37. 2022Simpler is Better: off-the-shelf Continual Learning Through Pretrained Backbonescited by 12
  38. 2017Learning More Universal Representations for Transfer-Learningcited by 6

50 most cited of 51 All 51 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 2.

7 papers.