mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning More Universal Representations for Transfer-Learning

arXiv 1712.09708 ↗First posted 27 Dec 2017cs.CV cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A representation is supposed universal if it encodes any element of the visual world (e.g., objects, scenes) in any configuration (e.g., scale, context). While not expecting pure universal representations, the goal in the literature is to improve the universality level, starting from a representation with a certain level. To do so, the state-of-the-art consists in learning CNN-based representations on a diversified training problem (e.g., ImageNet modified by adding annotated data). While it effectively increases universality, such approach still requires a large amount of efforts to satisfy the needs in annotated data. In this work, we propose two methods to improve universality, but pay special attention to limit the need of annotated data. We also propose a unified framework of the methods based on the diversifying of the training problem. Finally, to better match Atkinson's cognitive study about universal human representations, we proposed to rely on the transfer-learning scheme as well as a new metric to evaluate universality. This latter, aims us to demonstrates the interest of our methods on 10 target-problems, relating to the classification task and a variety of visual domains.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Dec 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

6 papers.