mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multi-Level Compositional Reasoning for Interactive Instruction Following

arXiv 2308.09387 ↗First posted 18 Aug 2023cs.RO cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Robotic agents performing domestic chores by natural language directives are required to master the complex job of navigating environment and interacting with objects in the environments. The tasks given to the agents are often composite thus are challenging as completing them require to reason about multiple subtasks, e.g., bring a cup of coffee. To address the challenge, we propose to divide and conquer it by breaking the task into multiple subgoals and attend to them individually for better navigation and interaction. We call it Multi-level Compositional Reasoning Agent (MCR-Agent). Specifically, we learn a three-level action policy. At the highest level, we infer a sequence of human-interpretable subgoals to be executed based on language instructions by a high-level policy composition controller. At the middle level, we discriminatively control the agent's navigation by a master policy by alternating between a navigation policy and various independent interaction policies. Finally, at the lowest level, we infer manipulation actions with the corresponding object masks using the appropriate interaction policy. Our approach not only generates human interpretable subgoals but also achieves 2.03% absolute gain to comparable state of the arts in the efficiency metric (PLWSR in unseen set) without using rule-based planning or a semantic spatial memory.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2023.

Builds on

45 of 53 references.

References · 45

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
  3. 2016Generative Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 1,597
  4. 2017Vision-and-Language Navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environmentscited by 1,027
  5. 2017AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AIcited by 869
  6. 2019ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Taskscited by 783
  7. 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 730
  8. 2018On Evaluation of Embodied Navigation Agentscited by 547
  9. 2017Learning Robust Rewards with Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 490
  10. 2020Beyond the Nav-Graph: Vision-and-Language Navigation in Continuous Environmentscited by 441
  11. 2017Embodied Question Answeringcited by 336
  12. 2019Causal Confusion in Imitation Learningcited by 288
33 more
  1. 2018Touchdown: Natural Language Navigation and Spatial Reasoning in Visual Street Environmentscited by 239
  2. 2017Cognitive Mapping and Planning for Visual Navigationcited by 212
  3. 2018Discriminator-Actor-Critic: Addressing Sample Inefficiency and Reward Bias in Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 204
  4. 2016Modular Multitask Reinforcement Learning with Policy Sketchescited by 203
  5. 2021TEACh: Task-driven Embodied Agents that Chatcited by 197
  6. 2020Mapping Natural Language Instructions to Mobile UI Action Sequencescited by 181
  7. 2019Vision-Language Navigation with Self-Supervised Auxiliary Reasoning Taskscited by 179
  8. 2019Self-Monitoring Navigation Agent via Auxiliary Progress Estimationcited by 176
  9. 2021Episodic Transformer for Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 156
  10. 2017IQA: Visual Question Answering in Interactive Environmentscited by 155
  11. 2018Visual Semantic Navigation using Scene Priorscited by 128
  12. 2021FILM: Following Instructions in Language with Modular Methodscited by 121
  13. 2018Learning to Learn How to Learn: Self-Adaptive Visual Navigation Using Meta-Learningcited by 93
  14. 2021A Persistent Spatial Semantic Representation for High-level Natural Language Instruction Executioncited by 91
  15. 2017Mapping Instructions and Visual Observations to Actions with Reinforcement Learningcited by 81
  16. 2019Multi-Target Embodied Question Answeringcited by 74
  17. 2020Learning Object Relation Graph and Tentative Policy for Visual Navigationcited by 64
  18. 2021Embodied BERT: A Transformer Model for Embodied, Language-guided Visual Task Completioncited by 58
  19. 2018Neural Modular Control for Embodied Question Answeringcited by 56
  20. 2019Are You Looking? Grounding to Multiple Modalities in Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 55
  21. 2021Hierarchical Task Learning from Language Instructions with Unified Transformers and Self-Monitoringcited by 53
  22. 2017Visual Semantic Planning using Deep Successor Representationscited by 45
  23. 2019Learning to Map Natural Language Instructions to Physical Quadcopter Control using Simulated Flightcited by 43
  24. 2021Grounding Open-Domain Instructions to Automate Web Support Taskscited by 43
  25. 2020Diagnosing the Environment Bias in Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 41
  26. 2020Factorizing Perception and Policy for Interactive Instruction Followingcited by 29
  27. 2021Look Wide and Interpret Twice: Improving Performance on Interactive Instruction-following Taskscited by 26
  28. 2022One Step at a Time: Long-Horizon Vision-and-Language Navigation with Milestonescited by 26
  29. 2021Interpretation of Emergent Communication in Heterogeneous Collaborative Embodied Agentscited by 19
  30. 2019Embodied Vision-and-Language Navigation with Dynamic Convolutional Filterscited by 9
  31. 2021Modular Framework for Visuomotor Language Groundingcited by 9
  32. 2022Moment-based Adversarial Training for Embodied Language Comprehensioncited by 8
  33. 2022What do navigation agents learn about their environment?cited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

7 papers.