mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Diagnosing the Environment Bias in Vision-and-Language Navigation

arXiv 2005.03086 ↗First posted 6 May 2020cs.CL cs.AI cs.CVcited by 41

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) requires an agent to follow natural-language instructions, explore the given environments, and reach the desired target locations. These step-by-step navigational instructions are crucial when the agent is navigating new environments about which it has no prior knowledge. Most recent works that study VLN observe a significant performance drop when tested on unseen environments (i.e., environments not used in training), indicating that the neural agent models are highly biased towards training environments. Although this issue is considered as one of the major challenges in VLN research, it is still under-studied and needs a clearer explanation. In this work, we design novel diagnosis experiments via environment re-splitting and feature replacement, looking into possible reasons for this environment bias. We observe that neither the language nor the underlying navigational graph, but the low-level visual appearance conveyed by ResNet features directly affects the agent model and contributes to this environment bias in results. According to this observation, we explore several kinds of semantic representations that contain less low-level visual information, hence the agent learned with these features could be better generalized to unseen testing environments. Without modifying the baseline agent model and its training method, our explored semantic features significantly decrease the performance gaps between seen and unseen on multiple datasets (i.e. R2R, R4R, and CVDN) and achieve competitive unseen results to previous state-of-the-art models. Our code and features are available at: https://github.com/zhangybzbo/EnvBiasVLN

Key facts. Cited by 41 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 May 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 8; 2022: 10; 2023: 9; 2024: 9; 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

41 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021History Aware Multimodal Transformer for Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 268
  2. 2021Airbert: In-domain Pretraining for Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 129
  3. 2022Vision-and-Language Navigation: A Survey of Tasks, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 116
  4. 2023Scaling Data Generation in Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 115
  5. 2022EnvEdit: Environment Editing for Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 83
  6. 2024Vision-and-Language Navigation Today and Tomorrow: A Survey in the Era of Foundation Modelscited by 79
  7. 2022A New Path: Scaling Vision-and-Language Navigation with Synthetic Instructions and Imitation Learningcited by 60
  8. 2021Hierarchical Task Learning from Language Instructions with Unified Transformers and Self-Monitoringcited by 53
  9. 2021SOAT: A Scene- and Object-Aware Transformer for Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 53
  10. 2024Vision-and-Language Navigation via Causal Learningcited by 51
  11. 2022Simple and Effective Synthesis of Indoor 3D Scenescited by 33
  12. 2021Core Challenges in Embodied Vision-Language Planningcited by 30
29 more
  1. 2023Grounded Entity-Landmark Adaptive Pre-training for Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 25
  2. 2022Analyzing Generalization of Vision and Language Navigation to Unseen Outdoor Areascited by 24
  3. 2022Causal Balancing for Domain Generalizationcited by 20
  4. 2023A Dual Semantic-Aware Recurrent Global-Adaptive Network For Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 18
  5. 2021VISITRON: Visual Semantics-Aligned Interactively Trained Object-Navigatorcited by 13
  6. 2023Kefa: A Knowledge Enhanced and Fine-grained Aligned Speaker for Navigation Instruction Generationcited by 11
  7. 2024Mind the Error! Detection and Localization of Instruction Errors in Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 11
  8. 2022CLEAR: Improving Vision-Language Navigation with Cross-Lingual, Environment-Agnostic Representationscited by 10
  9. 2024Vision-Language Navigation with Embodied Intelligence: A Surveycited by 9
  10. 2024Why Only Text: Empowering Vision-and-Language Navigation with Multi-modal Promptscited by 9
  11. 2021L2C: Describing Visual Differences Needs Semantic Understanding of Individualscited by 8
  12. 2022FedVLN: Privacy-preserving Federated Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 8
  13. 2023PASTS: Progress-Aware Spatio-Temporal Transformer Speaker For Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 8
  14. 2023Multi-Level Compositional Reasoning for Interactive Instruction Followingcited by 7
  15. 2024Vision-Language Navigation with Continual Learningcited by 6
  16. 2025NavQ: Learning a Q-Model for Foresighted Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 6
  17. 2021Counterfactual Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Training Deep Networkscited by 5
  18. 2022Spot the Difference: A Novel Task for Embodied Agents in Changing Environmentscited by 5
  19. 2026Limited Linguistic Diversity in Embodied AI Datasetscited by 5
  20. 2026Trajectory-Diversity-Driven Robust Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 4
  21. 2023ELBA: Learning by Asking for Embodied Visual Navigation and Task Completioncited by 3
  22. 2023Which way is `right'?: Uncovering limitations of Vision-and-Language Navigation modelcited by 3
  23. 2024Cog-GA: A Large Language Models-based Generative Agent for Vision-Language Navigation in Continuous Environmentscited by 3
  24. 2024I2EDL: Interactive Instruction Error Detection and Localizationcited by 1
  25. 2026A Comprehensive Survey and Systematic Real-World Evaluation of Embodied Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 1
  26. 2022On the Importance of Karaka Framework in Multi-modal Groundingcited by 0
  27. 2023Core Challenges in Embodied Vision-Language Planningcited by 0
  28. 2024Causality-based Cross-Modal Representation Learning for Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 0
  29. 2026What Limits Vision-and-Language Navigation ?cited by 0