mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Benchmarking Potential Based Rewards for Learning Humanoid Locomotion

arXiv 2307.10142 ↗First posted 19 Jul 2023cs.RO cs.AI cs.LGcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The main challenge in developing effective reinforcement learning (RL) pipelines is often the design and tuning the reward functions. Well-designed shaping reward can lead to significantly faster learning. Naively formulated rewards, however, can conflict with the desired behavior and result in overfitting or even erratic performance if not properly tuned. In theory, the broad class of potential based reward shaping (PBRS) can help guide the learning process without affecting the optimal policy. Although several studies have explored the use of potential based reward shaping to accelerate learning convergence, most have been limited to grid-worlds and low-dimensional systems, and RL in robotics has predominantly relied on standard forms of reward shaping. In this paper, we benchmark standard forms of shaping with PBRS for a humanoid robot. We find that in this high-dimensional system, PBRS has only marginal benefits in convergence speed. However, the PBRS reward terms are significantly more robust to scaling than typical reward shaping approaches, and thus easier to tune.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2023.

Builds on

17 of 29 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 2,026
  3. 2021Learning to Walk in Minutes Using Massively Parallel Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 512
  4. 2022Learning robust perceptive locomotion for quadrupedal robots in the wildcited by 382
  5. 2020Learning Agile Robotic Locomotion Skills by Imitating Animalscited by 251
  6. 2018DeepMimic: Example-Guided Deep Reinforcement Learning of Physics-Based Character Skillscited by 163
  7. 2020What Matters In On-Policy Reinforcement Learning? A Large-Scale Empirical Studycited by 162
  8. 2021Reinforcement Learning for Robust Parameterized Locomotion Control of Bipedal Robotscited by 116
  9. 2020Sim-to-Real Learning of All Common Bipedal Gaits via Periodic Reward Compositioncited by 96
  10. 2021Blind Bipedal Stair Traversal via Sim-to-Real Reinforcement Learningcited by 92
  11. 2021The MIT Humanoid Robot: Design, Motion Planning, and Control For Acrobatic Behaviorscited by 32
  12. 2016Automatic LQR Tuning Based on Gaussian Process Global Optimizationcited by 30
5 more
  1. 2022Lyapunov Design for Robust and Efficient Robotic Reinforcement Learningcited by 28
  2. 2017Bayesian Optimization Using Domain Knowledge on the ATRIAS Bipedcited by 17
  3. 2020Learning Spring Mass Locomotion: Guiding Policies with a Reduced-Order Modelcited by 15
  4. 2022Learning to Brachiate via Simplified Model Imitationcited by 9
  5. 2020Learning to Run with Potential-Based Reward Shaping and Demonstrations from Video Datacited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 4.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: