mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Lyapunov Design for Robust and Efficient Robotic Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2208.06721 ↗First posted 13 Aug 2022cs.RO cs.SY eess.SYcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in the reinforcement learning (RL) literature have enabled roboticists to automatically train complex policies in simulated environments. However, due to the poor sample complexity of these methods, solving RL problems using real-world data remains a challenging problem. This paper introduces a novel cost-shaping method which aims to reduce the number of samples needed to learn a stabilizing controller. The method adds a term involving a Control Lyapunov Function (CLF) -- an `energy-like' function from the model-based control literature -- to typical cost formulations. Theoretical results demonstrate the new costs lead to stabilizing controllers when smaller discount factors are used, which is well-known to reduce sample complexity. Moreover, the addition of the CLF term `robustifies' the search for a stabilizing controller by ensuring that even highly sub-optimal polices will stabilize the system. We demonstrate our approach with two hardware examples where we learn stabilizing controllers for a cartpole and an A1 quadruped with only seconds and a few minutes of fine-tuning data, respectively. Furthermore, simulation benchmark studies show that obtaining stabilizing policies by optimizing our proposed costs requires orders of magnitude less data compared to standard cost designs.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 6; 2024: 9; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024SERL: A Software Suite for Sample-Efficient Robotic Reinforcement Learningcited by 113
  2. 2024Reinforcement Learning for Versatile, Dynamic, and Robust Bipedal Locomotion Controlcited by 63
  3. 2025Rapidly Adapting Policies to the Real World via Simulation-Guided Fine-Tuningcited by 15
  4. 2024Learning to Walk from Three Minutes of Real-World Data with Semi-structured Dynamics Modelscited by 14
  5. 2023Physics-Regulated Deep Reinforcement Learning: Invariant Embeddingscited by 8
  6. 2023Benchmarking Potential Based Rewards for Learning Humanoid Locomotioncited by 7
  7. 2023Value Functions are Control Barrier Functions: Verification of Safe Policies using Control Theorycited by 5
  8. 2023Physical Deep Reinforcement Learning Towards Safety Guaranteecited by 3
  9. 2026Simulation Distillation: Pretraining World Models in Simulation for Rapid Real-World Adaptationcited by 3
  10. 2024Decomposing Control Lyapunov Functions for Efficient Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
  11. 2024Distributionally Robust Policy and Lyapunov-Certificate Learningcited by 2
  12. 2024Simplex-enabled Safe Continual Learning Machinecited by 2
8 more
  1. 2024Dense Dynamics-Aware Reward Synthesis: Integrating Prior Experience with Demonstrationscited by 1
  2. 2023Learning to Stabilize Online Reinforcement Learning in Unbounded State Spacescited by 0
  3. 2023Enabling Efficient, Reliable Real-World Reinforcement Learning with Approximate Physics-Based Modelscited by 0
  4. 2024Gait Switching and Enhanced Stabilization of Walking Robots with Deep Learning-based Reachability: A Case Study on Two-link Walkercited by 0
  5. 2024Physics-model-guided Worst-case Sampling for Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  6. 2025Real-DRL: Teach and Learn in Realitycited by 0
  7. 2026Safe Online Learning via Smooth Safety-Structured Policy Compositioncited by 0
  8. 2026Safe and Robust Neural Policy Learning with Statistical Verification for Sim-to-Real Deployment in Roboticscited by 0