mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robustness of Multi-Source MT to Transcription Errors

arXiv 2305.16894 ↗First posted 26 May 2023cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automatic speech translation is sensitive to speech recognition errors, but in a multilingual scenario, the same content may be available in various languages via simultaneous interpreting, dubbing or subtitling. In this paper, we hypothesize that leveraging multiple sources will improve translation quality if the sources complement one another in terms of correct information they contain. To this end, we first show that on a 10-hour ESIC corpus, the ASR errors in the original English speech and its simultaneous interpreting into German and Czech are mutually independent. We then use two sources, English and German, in a multi-source setting for translation into Czech to establish its robustness to ASR errors. Furthermore, we observe this robustness when translating both noisy sources together in a simultaneous translation setting. Our results show that multi-source neural machine translation has the potential to be useful in a real-time simultaneous translation setting, thereby motivating further investigation in this area.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2023.

Builds on

25 of 53 references.

References · 25

  1. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,973
  2. 2020Conformer: Convolution-augmented Transformer for Speech Recognitioncited by 1,838
  3. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  4. 2021VoxPopuli: A Large-Scale Multilingual Speech Corpus for Representation Learning, Semi-Supervised Learning and Interpretationcited by 455
  5. 2019NeMo: a toolkit for building AI applications using Neural Modulescited by 230
  6. 2018Marian: Fast Neural Machine Translation in C++cited by 202
  7. 2020Speech Translation and the End-to-End Promise: Taking Stock of Where We Arecited by 77
  8. 2020Unbabel's Participation in the WMT20 Metrics Shared Taskcited by 56
  9. 2016Zero-Resource Translation with Multi-Lingual Neural Machine Translationcited by 46
  10. 2018Dual Conditional Cross-Entropy Filtering of Noisy Parallel Corporacited by 40
  11. 2016Multi-Source Neural Translationcited by 37
  12. 2018Low-Latency Neural Speech Translationcited by 35
13 more
  1. 2020Re-translation versus Streaming for Simultaneous Translationcited by 30
  2. 2022CUNI-KIT System for Simultaneous Speech Translation Task at IWSLT 2022cited by 30
  3. 2020Super-Human Performance in Online Low-latency Recognition of Conversational Speechcited by 20
  4. 2021Hallucination of speech recognition errors with sequence to sequence learningcited by 14
  5. 2019Robust Neural Machine Translation for Clean and Noisy Speech Transcriptscited by 13
  6. 2021Is "moby dick" a Whale or a Bird? Named Entities and Terminology in Speech Translationcited by 11
  7. 2021Lost in Interpreting: Speech Translation from Source or Interpreter?cited by 10
  8. 2022Who Are We Talking About? Handling Person Names in Speech Translationcited by 8
  9. 2018Multi-Source Neural Machine Translation with Data Augmentationcited by 6
  10. 2021Simultaneous Multi-Pivot Neural Machine Translationcited by 6
  11. 2019Assessing the Tolerance of Neural Machine Translation Systems Against Speech Recognition Errorscited by 2
  12. 2019A Speech Test Set of Practice Business Presentations with Additional Relevant Textscited by 2
  13. 2022The Reality of Multi-Lingual Machine Translationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

2 papers.