mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reanalysis of Variance Reduced Temporal Difference Learning

arXiv 2001.01898 ↗First posted 7 Jan 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Temporal difference (TD) learning is a popular algorithm for policy evaluation in reinforcement learning, but the vanilla TD can substantially suffer from the inherent optimization variance. A variance reduced TD (VRTD) algorithm was proposed by Korda and La (2015), which applies the variance reduction technique directly to the online TD learning with Markovian samples. In this work, we first point out the technical errors in the analysis of VRTD in Korda and La (2015), and then provide a mathematically solid analysis of the non-asymptotic convergence of VRTD and its variance reduction performance. We show that VRTD is guaranteed to converge to a neighborhood of the fixed-point solution of TD at a linear convergence rate. Furthermore, the variance error (for both i.i.d. and Markovian sampling) and the bias error (for Markovian sampling) of VRTD are significantly reduced by the batch size of variance reduction in comparison to those of vanilla TD. As a result, the overall computational complexity of VRTD to attain a given accurate solution outperforms that of TD under Markov sampling and outperforms that of TD under i.i.d. sampling for a sufficiently small conditional number.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2020: 1; 2021: 8; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

23 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Is Q-Learning Minimax Optimal? A Tight Sample Complexity Analysiscited by 89
  2. 2022Pessimistic Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning: Towards Optimal Sample Complexitycited by 84
  3. 2021Breaking the Sample Complexity Barrier to Regret-Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 51
  4. 2022The Efficacy of Pessimism in Asynchronous Q-Learningcited by 41
  5. 2021Online Bootstrap Inference For Policy Evaluation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 26
  6. 2021Tighter Analysis of Alternating Stochastic Gradient Method for Stochastic Nested Problemscited by 21
  7. 2021Doubly Robust Off-Policy Actor-Critic: Convergence and Optimalitycited by 20
  8. 2021Accelerated and instance-optimal policy evaluation with linear function approximationcited by 18
  9. 2020When Will Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning Algorithms Attain Global Convergencecited by 12
  10. 2023Regret-Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learning for Discounted MDPs with Short Burn-In Timecited by 8
  11. 2024Gap-Dependent Bounds for Q-Learning using Reference-Advantage Decompositioncited by 8
  12. 2021Greedy-GQ with Variance Reduction: Finite-time Analysis and Improved Complexitycited by 7
11 more
  1. 2021Multi-Agent Off-Policy TD Learning: Finite-Time Analysis with Near-Optimal Sample Complexity and Communication Complexitycited by 5
  2. 2022Instance-Dependent Confidence and Early Stopping for Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
  3. 2025Gap-Dependent Bounds for Federated Q-learningcited by 4
  4. 2023n-Step Temporal Difference Learning with Optimal ncited by 2
  5. 2025KETCHUP: K-Step Return Estimation for Sequential Knowledge Distillationcited by 2
  6. 2025Regret-Optimal Q-Learning with Low Cost for Single-Agent and Federated Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
  7. 2022Closing the gap between SVRG and TD-SVRG with Gradient Splittingcited by 1
  8. 2024Regularized Q-Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 1
  9. 2025Q-Learning with Fine-Grained Gap-Dependent Regretcited by 1
  10. 2026A Banach-Space Theory of Markovian Halpern Iteration for Non-Expansive Mapscited by 1
  11. 2025FIRM: Federated In-client Regularized Multi-objective Alignment for Large Language Modelscited by 0