mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

3D-IntPhys: Towards More Generalized 3D-grounded Visual Intuitive Physics under Challenging Scenes

arXiv 2304.11470 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2023cs.CV cs.AIcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Given a visual scene, humans have strong intuitions about how a scene can evolve over time under given actions. The intuition, often termed visual intuitive physics, is a critical ability that allows us to make effective plans to manipulate the scene to achieve desired outcomes without relying on extensive trial and error. In this paper, we present a framework capable of learning 3D-grounded visual intuitive physics models from videos of complex scenes with fluids. Our method is composed of a conditional Neural Radiance Field (NeRF)-style visual frontend and a 3D point-based dynamics prediction backend, using which we can impose strong relational and structural inductive bias to capture the structure of the underlying environment. Unlike existing intuitive point-based dynamics works that rely on the supervision of dense point trajectory from simulators, we relax the requirements and only assume access to multi-view RGB images and (imperfect) instance masks acquired using color prior. This enables the proposed model to handle scenarios where accurate point estimation and tracking are hard or impossible. We generate datasets including three challenging scenarios involving fluid, granular materials, and rigid objects in the simulation. The datasets do not include any dense particle information so most previous 3D-based intuitive physics pipelines can barely deal with that. We show our model can make long-horizon future predictions by learning from raw images and significantly outperforms models that do not employ an explicit 3D representation space. We also show that once trained, our model can achieve strong generalization in complex scenarios under extrapolate settings.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 56 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2023.

Builds on

56 of 79 references.

References · 56

  1. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  2. 2019Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imaginationcited by 1,653
  3. 2020pixelNeRF: Neural Radiance Fields from One or Few Imagescited by 1,584
  4. 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,360
  5. 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,353
  6. 2018Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixelscited by 1,264
  7. 2020Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph Networkscited by 880
  8. 2020Learning Mesh-Based Simulation with Graph Networkscited by 868
  9. 2019When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 773
  10. 2023Segment Everything Everywhere All at Oncecited by 548
  11. 2016Deep Visual Foresight for Planning Robot Motioncited by 285
  12. 2018Large-Scale Study of Curiosity-Driven Learningcited by 280
38 more
  1. 2015Embed to Control: A Locally Linear Latent Dynamics Model for Control from Raw Imagescited by 274
  2. 2016Unsupervised Learning for Physical Interaction through Video Predictioncited by 260
  3. 2018Graph networks as learnable physics engines for inference and controlcited by 244
  4. 2018Learning Particle Dynamics for Manipulating Rigid Bodies, Deformable Objects, and Fluidscited by 220
  5. 2019Contrastive Learning of Structured World Modelscited by 209
  6. 2018Stochastic Adversarial Video Predictioncited by 173
  7. 2016Learning to Poke by Poking: Experiential Learning of Intuitive Physicscited by 154
  8. 2021Physion: Evaluating Physical Prediction from Vision in Humans and Machinescited by 153
  9. 2020Combining Differentiable PDE Solvers and Graph Neural Networks for Fluid Flow Predictioncited by 138
  10. 2016A Compositional Object-Based Approach to Learning Physical Dynamicscited by 119
  11. 20213D Neural Scene Representations for Visuomotor Controlcited by 111
  12. 2019Entity Abstraction in Visual Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 110
  13. 2017Visual Interaction Networkscited by 95
  14. 2018Flexible Neural Representation for Physics Predictioncited by 91
  15. 2021FitVid: Overfitting in Pixel-Level Video Predictioncited by 87
  16. 2021Greedy Hierarchical Variational Autoencoders for Large-Scale Video Predictioncited by 75
  17. 2022RoboCraft: Learning to See, Simulate, and Shape Elasto-Plastic Objects with Graph Networkscited by 72
  18. 2020Keypoints into the Future: Self-Supervised Correspondence in Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 70
  19. 2016Learning Physical Intuition of Block Towers by Examplecited by 68
  20. 2018Propagation Networks for Model-Based Control Under Partial Observationcited by 64
  21. 2019DensePhysNet: Learning Dense Physical Object Representations via Multi-step Dynamic Interactionscited by 63
  22. 2022Learning Multi-Object Dynamics with Compositional Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 63
  23. 2021Learning Visible Connectivity Dynamics for Cloth Smoothingcited by 62
  24. 2015Learning Visual Predictive Models of Physics for Playing Billiardscited by 58
  25. 2020Visual Grounding of Learned Physical Modelscited by 55
  26. 2018Reasoning About Physical Interactions with Object-Oriented Prediction and Planningcited by 51
  27. 2016Visual Dynamics: Probabilistic Future Frame Synthesis via Cross Convolutional Networkscited by 46
  28. 2020Learning Long-term Visual Dynamics with Region Proposal Interaction Networkscited by 44
  29. 2019Compositional Video Predictioncited by 43
  30. 2020Learning 3D Dynamic Scene Representations for Robot Manipulationcited by 39
  31. 2022Physical Design using Differentiable Learned Simulatorscited by 37
  32. 2021Learning Models as Functionals of Signed-Distance Fields for Manipulation Planningcited by 29
  33. 2020The Surprising Effectiveness of Linear Models for Visual Foresight in Object Pile Manipulationcited by 25
  34. 2018Relational Forward Models for Multi-Agent Learningcited by 21
  35. 20203D-OES: Viewpoint-Invariant Object-Factorized Environment Simulatorscited by 21
  36. 2019Object-centric Forward Modeling for Model Predictive Controlcited by 19
  37. 2019Combining Physical Simulators and Object-Based Networks for Controlcited by 18
  38. 2020Forward Prediction for Physical Reasoningcited by 18

50 most cited of 56 All 56 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

12 papers.