Crowd Counting with Sparse Annotation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper presents a new annotation method called Sparse Annotation (SA) for crowd counting, which reduces human labeling efforts by sparsely labeling individuals in an image. We argue that sparse labeling can reduce the redundancy of full annotation and capture more diverse information from distant individuals that is not fully captured by Partial Annotation methods. Besides, we propose a point-based Progressive Point Matching network (PPM) to better explore the crowd from the whole image with sparse annotation, which includes a Proposal Matching Network (PMN) and a Performance Restoration Network (PRN). The PMN generates pseudo-point samples using a basic point classifier, while the PRN refines the point classifier with the pseudo points to maximize performance. Our experimental results show that PPM outperforms previous semi-supervised crowd counting methods with the same amount of annotation by a large margin and achieves competitive performance with state-of-the-art fully-supervised methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2023.
Builds on
32 of 67 references.
References · 32
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2018CSRNet: Dilated Convolutional Neural Networks for Understanding the Highly Congested Scenescited by 267
- 2018Composition Loss for Counting, Density Map Estimation and Localization in Dense Crowdscited by 186
- 2019Bayesian Loss for Crowd Count Estimation with Point Supervisioncited by 162
- 2021Rethinking Counting and Localization in Crowds:A Purely Point-Based Frameworkcited by 152
- 2020NWPU-Crowd: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Crowd Counting and Localizationcited by 151
- 2018Context-Aware Crowd Countingcited by 150
- 2020Distribution Matching for Crowd Countingcited by 143
- 2020JHU-CROWD++: Large-Scale Crowd Counting Dataset and A Benchmark Methodcited by 109
- 2017Switching Convolutional Neural Network for Crowd Countingcited by 93
- 2022An End-to-End Transformer Model for Crowd Localizationcited by 74
- 2022Boosting Crowd Counting via Multifaceted Attentioncited by 73
20 more
- 2021TransCrowd: weakly-supervised crowd counting with transformerscited by 61
- 2018Leveraging Unlabeled Data for Crowd Counting by Learning to Rankcited by 57
- 2019Crowd Counting and Density Estimation by Trellis Encoder-Decoder Networkcited by 56
- 2017Generating High-Quality Crowd Density Maps using Contextual Pyramid CNNscited by 55
- 2018ADCrowdNet: An Attention-injective Deformable Convolutional Network for Crowd Understandingcited by 45
- 2021Spatial Uncertainty-Aware Semi-Supervised Crowd Countingcited by 38
- 2021Focal Inverse Distance Transform Maps for Crowd Localizationcited by 36
- 2020Semi-Supervised Crowd Counting via Self-Training on Surrogate Taskscited by 35
- 2020Towards Using Count-level Weak Supervision for Crowd Countingcited by 33
- 2019HA-CCN: Hierarchical Attention-based Crowd Counting Networkcited by 32
- 2020Weighing Counts: Sequential Crowd Counting by Reinforcement Learningcited by 30
- 2020Shallow Feature Based Dense Attention Network for Crowd Countingcited by 28
- 2020Learning to Count in the Crowd from Limited Labeled Datacited by 27
- 2020Completely Self-Supervised Crowd Counting via Distribution Matchingcited by 22
- 2021Uniformity in Heterogeneity:Diving Deep into Count Interval Partition for Crowd Countingcited by 20
- 2022Discrete-Constrained Regression for Local Counting Modelscited by 19
- 2022Semi-supervised Crowd Counting via Density Agencycited by 18
- 2021Scene-Adaptive Attention Network for Crowd Countingcited by 12
- 2022CrowdMLP: Weakly-Supervised Crowd Counting via Multi-Granularity MLPcited by 8
- 2022Glance to Count: Learning to Rank with Anchors for Weakly-supervised Crowd Countingcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.