mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Discrete-Constrained Regression for Local Counting Models

arXiv 2207.09865 ↗First posted 20 Jul 2022cs.CVcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Local counts, or the number of objects in a local area, is a continuous value by nature. Yet recent state-of-the-art methods show that formulating counting as a classification task performs better than regression. Through a series of experiments on carefully controlled synthetic data, we show that this counter-intuitive result is caused by imprecise ground truth local counts. Factors such as biased dot annotations and incorrectly matched Gaussian kernels used to generate ground truth counts introduce deviations from the true local counts. Standard continuous regression is highly sensitive to these errors, explaining the performance gap between classification and regression. To mitigate the sensitivity, we loosen the regression formulation from a continuous scale to a discrete ordering and propose a novel discrete-constrained (DC) regression. Applied to crowd counting, DC-regression is more accurate than both classification and standard regression on three public benchmarks. A similar advantage also holds for the age estimation task, verifying the overall effectiveness of DC-regression.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2022.

Builds on

19 of 34 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  2. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  3. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  4. 2016Stacked Hourglass Networks for Human Pose Estimationcited by 915
  5. 2018Simple Baselines for Human Pose Estimation and Trackingcited by 502
  6. 2018CSRNet: Dilated Convolutional Neural Networks for Understanding the Highly Congested Scenescited by 267
  7. 2018Composition Loss for Counting, Density Map Estimation and Localization in Dense Crowdscited by 186
  8. 2019Bayesian Loss for Crowd Count Estimation with Point Supervisioncited by 162
  9. 2020Distribution Matching for Crowd Countingcited by 143
  10. 2020JHU-CROWD++: Large-Scale Crowd Counting Dataset and A Benchmark Methodcited by 109
  11. 2019From Open Set to Closed Set: Counting Objects by Spatial Divide-and-Conquercited by 48
  12. 2018Deep attention-based classification network for robust depth predictioncited by 36
7 more
  1. 2019Multi-Level Bottom-Top and Top-Bottom Feature Fusion for Crowd Countingcited by 36
  2. 2019Counting with Focus for Freecited by 33
  3. 2017Count-ception: Counting by Fully Convolutional Redundant Countingcited by 30
  4. 2020Adaptive Mixture Regression Network with Local Counting Map for Crowd Countingcited by 28
  5. 2021Uniformity in Heterogeneity:Diving Deep into Count Interval Partition for Crowd Countingcited by 20
  6. 2018PaDNet: Pan-Density Crowd Countingcited by 16
  7. 2017Quantifying Facial Age by Posterior of Age Comparisonscited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 9; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

19 papers.

Sort:

By area: