mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Uniformity in Heterogeneity:Diving Deep into Count Interval Partition for Crowd Counting

arXiv 2107.12619 ↗First posted 27 Jul 2021cs.CV cs.LGcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, the problem of inaccurate learning targets in crowd counting draws increasing attention. Inspired by a few pioneering work, we solve this problem by trying to predict the indices of pre-defined interval bins of counts instead of the count values themselves. However, an inappropriate interval setting might make the count error contributions from different intervals extremely imbalanced, leading to inferior counting performance. Therefore, we propose a novel count interval partition criterion called Uniform Error Partition (UEP), which always keeps the expected counting error contributions equal for all intervals to minimize the prediction risk. Then to mitigate the inevitably introduced discretization errors in the count quantization process, we propose another criterion called Mean Count Proxies (MCP). The MCP criterion selects the best count proxy for each interval to represent its count value during inference, making the overall expected discretization error of an image nearly negligible. As far as we are aware, this work is the first to delve into such a classification task and ends up with a promising solution for count interval partition. Following the above two theoretically demonstrated criterions, we propose a simple yet effective model termed Uniform Error Partition Network (UEPNet), which achieves state-of-the-art performance on several challenging datasets. The codes will be available at: https://github.com/TencentYoutuResearch/CrowdCounting-UEPNet.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2021.

Builds on

18 of 28 references.

References · 18

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  2. 2018Deep Ordinal Regression Network for Monocular Depth Estimationcited by 723
  3. 2018CSRNet: Dilated Convolutional Neural Networks for Understanding the Highly Congested Scenescited by 267
  4. 2018Composition Loss for Counting, Density Map Estimation and Localization in Dense Crowdscited by 186
  5. 2019Bayesian Loss for Crowd Count Estimation with Point Supervisioncited by 162
  6. 2018Context-Aware Crowd Countingcited by 150
  7. 2019Crowd Counting and Density Estimation by Trellis Encoder-Decoder Networkcited by 56
  8. 2019Perspective-Guided Convolution Networks for Crowd Countingcited by 54
  9. 2019From Open Set to Closed Set: Counting Objects by Spatial Divide-and-Conquercited by 48
  10. 2019Crowd Counting with Deep Structured Scale Integration Networkcited by 46
  11. 2020CNN-based Density Estimation and Crowd Counting: A Surveycited by 43
  12. 2019Learning Spatial Awareness to Improve Crowd Countingcited by 36
6 more
  1. 2020NAS-Count: Counting-by-Density with Neural Architecture Searchcited by 36
  2. 2020Weighing Counts: Sequential Crowd Counting by Reinforcement Learningcited by 30
  3. 2020Adaptive Mixture Regression Network with Local Counting Map for Crowd Countingcited by 28
  4. 2020Shallow Feature Based Dense Attention Network for Crowd Countingcited by 28
  5. 2019Crowd Counting with Decomposed Uncertaintycited by 20
  6. 2019Improving Dense Crowd Counting Convolutional Neural Networks using Inverse k-Nearest Neighbor Maps and Multiscale Upsamplingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 7; 2023: 6; 2024: 4; 2025: 3.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Occluded Human Mesh Recoverycited by 54
  2. 2023CrowdCLIP: Unsupervised Crowd Counting via Vision-Language Modelcited by 47
  3. 2022Exemplar Free Class Agnostic Countingcited by 32
  4. 2022Discrete-Constrained Regression for Local Counting Modelscited by 19
  5. 2022Semi-supervised Crowd Counting via Density Agencycited by 18
  6. 2022Redesigning Multi-Scale Neural Network for Crowd Countingcited by 17
  7. 2023Regressor-Segmenter Mutual Prompt Learning for Crowd Countingcited by 16
  8. 2024CLIP-EBC: CLIP Can Count Accurately through Enhanced Blockwise Classificationcited by 12
  9. 2022Self-supervised Domain Adaptation in Crowd Countingcited by 11
  10. 2023Deep Imbalanced Regression via Hierarchical Classification Adjustmentcited by 9
  11. 2023Focus for Free in Density-Based Countingcited by 8
  12. 2024Semi-supervised Counting via Pixel-by-pixel Density Distribution Modellingcited by 7
8 more
  1. 2023Semi-Supervised Crowd Counting with Contextual Modeling: Facilitating Holistic Understanding of Crowd Scenescited by 6
  2. 2025Taste More, Taste Better: Diverse Data and Strong Model Boost Semi-Supervised Crowd Countingcited by 5
  3. 2025ZIP: Scalable Crowd Counting via Zero-Inflated Poisson Modelingcited by 2
  4. 2022Counting with Adaptive Auxiliary Learningcited by 1
  5. 2024Virtual Classification: Modulating Domain-Specific Knowledge for Multidomain Crowd Countingcited by 1
  6. 2023Crowd Counting with Sparse Annotationcited by 0
  7. 2024A Lightweight Feature Fusion Architecture For Resource-Constrained Crowd Countingcited by 0
  8. 2025CardiacCLIP: Video-based CLIP Adaptation for LVEF Prediction in a Few-shot Mannercited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2021Spatial Uncertainty-Aware Semi-Supervised Crowd Counting
  2. 2022Forget Less, Count Better: A Domain-Incremental Self-Distillation Learning Benchmark for Lifelong Crowd Counting
  3. 2026DCA-MoE: Spatially Adaptive Cross-Layer Fusion and Density-Routed Experts for Crowd Counting
  4. 2023SYRAC: Synthesize, Rank, and Count
  5. 2024VMambaCC: A Visual State Space Model for Crowd Counting
  6. 2026ABACUS: Adapting Unified Foundation Model for Bridging Image Count Understanding and Generation
  7. 2023CrowdDiff: Multi-hypothesis Crowd Density Estimation using Diffusion Models
  8. 2024Multi-modal Crowd Counting via a Broker Modality