mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Monge Gap: A Regularizer to Learn All Transport Maps

arXiv 2302.04953 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 32

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Optimal transport (OT) theory has been been used in machine learning to study and characterize maps that can push-forward efficiently a probability measure onto another. Recent works have drawn inspiration from Brenier's theorem, which states that when the ground cost is the squared-Euclidean distance, the ``best'' map to morph a continuous measure in P(Rd) into another must be the gradient of a convex function. To exploit that result, [Makkuva+ 2020, Korotin+2020] consider maps T=nabla fθ, where fθ is an input convex neural network (ICNN), as defined by Amos+2017, and fit θ with SGD using samples. Despite their mathematical elegance, fitting OT maps with ICNNs raises many challenges, due notably to the many constraints imposed on θ; the need to approximate the conjugate of fθ; or the limitation that they only work for the squared-Euclidean cost. More generally, we question the relevance of using Brenier's result, which only applies to densities, to constrain the architecture of candidate maps fitted on samples. Motivated by these limitations, we propose a radically different approach to estimating OT maps: Given a cost c and a reference measure ρ, we introduce a regularizer, the Monge gap Mcρ(T) of a map T. That gap quantifies how far a map T deviates from the ideal properties we expect from a c-OT map. In practice, we drop all architecture requirements for T and simply minimize a distance (e.g., the Sinkhorn divergence) between Tsharpμ and nu, regularized by Mcρ(T). We study Mcρ, and show how our simple pipeline outperforms significantly other baselines in practice.

Key facts. Cited by 32 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2023.

Builds on

37 of 66 references.

References · 37

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
  3. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
  4. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
  5. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
  6. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
  7. 2018Computational Optimal Transportcited by 780
  8. 2015Optimal Transport for Domain Adaptationcited by 463
  9. 2016Input Convex Neural Networkscited by 414
  10. 2017Joint Distribution Optimal Transportation for Domain Adaptationcited by 282
  11. 2019Optimal transport mapping via input convex neural networkscited by 206
  12. 2015On Wasserstein Two Sample Testing and Related Families of Nonparametric Testscited by 166
25 more
  1. 2022Neural Optimal Transportcited by 126
  2. 2018Improving GANs Using Optimal Transportcited by 123
  3. 2022Optimal Transport Tools (OTT): A JAX Toolbox for all things Wassersteincited by 101
  4. 2019Wasserstein-2 Generative Networkscited by 97
  5. 2021Do Neural Optimal Transport Solvers Work? A Continuous Wasserstein-2 Benchmarkcited by 96
  6. 2021Proximal Optimal Transport Modeling of Population Dynamicscited by 93
  7. 2021Entropic estimation of optimal transport mapscited by 90
  8. 2020Robust Optimal Transport with Applications in Generative Modeling and Domain Adaptationcited by 87
  9. 2019Statistical bounds for entropic optimal transport: sample complexity and the central limit theoremcited by 85
  10. 2020Faster Wasserstein Distance Estimation with the Sinkhorn Divergencecited by 73
  11. 2022Supervised Training of Conditional Monge Mapscited by 61
  12. 2020Scalable Computations of Wasserstein Barycenter via Input Convex Neural Networkscited by 50
  13. 2018Scalable Unbalanced Optimal Transport using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 42
  14. 2017From optimal transport to generative modeling: the VEGAN cookbookcited by 41
  15. 2022Neural Optimal Transport with General Cost Functionalscited by 36
  16. 2022On amortizing convex conjugates for optimal transportcited by 31
  17. 2019On Scalable and Efficient Computation of Large Scale Optimal Transportcited by 29
  18. 2019On approximating nabla f with neural networkscited by 18
  19. 2021Riemannian Convex Potential Mapscited by 17
  20. 2021Input Convex Gradient Networkscited by 17
  21. 2022Neural Unbalanced Optimal Transport via Cycle-Consistent Semi-Couplingscited by 17
  22. 2022On Investigating the Conservative Property of Score-Based Generative Modelscited by 16
  23. 2020Large-Scale Optimal Transport via Adversarial Training with Cycle-Consistencycited by 14
  24. 2022An Optimal Transport Perspective on Unpaired Image Super-Resolutioncited by 12
  25. 2021Implicit Riemannian Concave Potential Mapscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 7; 2024: 14; 2025: 6; 2026: 5.

32 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Optimal Flow Matching: Learning Straight Trajectories in Just One Stepcited by 78
  2. 2023A Computational Framework for Solving Wasserstein Lagrangian Flowscited by 46
  3. 2024Meta Flow Matching: Integrating Vector Fields on the Wasserstein Manifoldcited by 43
  4. 2023Unbalancedness in Neural Monge Maps Improves Unpaired Domain Translationcited by 33
  5. 2023GENOT: Entropic (Gromov) Wasserstein Flow Matching with Applications to Single-Cell Genomicscited by 28
  6. 2023Conditional Optimal Transport on Function Spacescited by 26
  7. 2024Learning diffusion at lightspeedcited by 22
  8. 2024Neural Optimal Transport with Lagrangian Costscited by 16
  9. 2023Causal Optimal Transport of Abstractionscited by 13
  10. 2024Progressive Entropic Optimal Transport Solverscited by 10
  11. 2025Learning of Population Dynamics: Inverse Optimization Meets JKO Schemecited by 9
  12. 2024Contrasting Multiple Representations with the Multi-Marginal Matching Gapcited by 8
20 more
  1. 2023A generative flow for conditional sampling via optimal transportcited by 7
  2. 2023Uncovering Challenges of Solving the Continuous Gromov-Wasserstein Problemcited by 6
  3. 2024ENOT: Expectile Regularization for Fast and Accurate Training of Neural Optimal Transportcited by 6
  4. 2025Overcoming Spurious Solutions in Semi-Dual Neural Optimal Transport: A Smoothing Approach for Learning the Optimal Transport Plancited by 6
  5. 2024Paired Wasserstein Autoencoders for Conditional Samplingcited by 5
  6. 2024Revisiting Counterfactual Regression through the Lens of Gromov-Wasserstein Information Bottleneckcited by 4
  7. 2024Quantum Theory and Application of Contextual Optimal Transportcited by 3
  8. 2024Disentangled Representation Learning with the Gromov-Monge Gapcited by 3
  9. 2025Towards generalizable single-cell perturbation modeling via the Conditional Monge Gapcited by 3
  10. 2026SOTAlign: Semi-Supervised Alignment of Unimodal Vision and Language Models via Optimal Transportcited by 3
  11. 2024Differentiable Cost-Parameterized Monge Map Estimatorscited by 2
  12. 2024GeOT: A spatially explicit framework for evaluating spatio-temporal predictionscited by 1
  13. 2025Displacement-Sparse Neural Optimal Transportcited by 1
  14. 2025Estimation of Stochastic Optimal Transport Mapscited by 1
  15. 2026Amortized Maximum Inner Product Search with Learned Support Functionscited by 1
  16. 2024Strongly Isomorphic Neural Optimal Transport Across Incomparable Spacescited by 0
  17. 2025Transformers for Tabular Data: A Training Perspective of Self-Attention via Optimal Transportcited by 0
  18. 2026Sampling Boltzmann distributions via normalizing flow approximation of transport mapscited by 0
  19. 2026Conditional Neural Optimal Transport for Predicting Cellular Phenotypes from Molecular Structurecited by 0
  20. 2026Brenier Meets Adversarial Training: Optimal Transport Geometry for Robust Learningcited by 0