mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Uncovering Challenges of Solving the Continuous Gromov-Wasserstein Problem

arXiv 2303.05978 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2023cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, the Gromov-Wasserstein Optimal Transport (GWOT) problem has attracted the special attention of the ML community. In this problem, given two distributions supported on two (possibly different) spaces, one has to find the most isometric map between them. In the discrete variant of GWOT, the task is to learn an assignment between given discrete sets of points. In the more advanced continuous formulation, one aims at recovering a parametric mapping between unknown continuous distributions based on i.i.d. samples derived from them. The clear geometrical intuition behind the GWOT makes it a natural choice for several practical use cases, giving rise to a number of proposed solvers. Some of them claim to solve the continuous version of the problem. At the same time, GWOT is notoriously hard, both theoretically and numerically. Moreover, all existing continuous GWOT solvers still heavily rely on discrete techniques. Natural questions arise: to what extent do existing methods unravel the GWOT problem, what difficulties do they encounter, and under which conditions they are successful? Our benchmark paper is an attempt to answer these questions. We specifically focus on the continuous GWOT as the most interesting and debatable setup. We crash-test existing continuous GWOT approaches on different scenarios, carefully record and analyze the obtained results, and identify issues. Our findings experimentally testify that the scientific community is still missing a reliable continuous GWOT solver, which necessitates further research efforts. As the first step in this direction, we propose a new continuous GWOT method which does not rely on discrete techniques and partially solves some of the problems of the competitors.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2023.

Builds on

45 of 86 references.

References · 45

  1. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
  2. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
  3. 2018Computational Optimal Transportcited by 765
  4. 2018Which Training Methods for GANs do actually Converge?cited by 672
  5. 2017Word Translation Without Parallel Datacited by 480
  6. 2015Optimal Transport for Domain Adaptationcited by 457
  7. 2016FastText.zip: Compressing text classification modelscited by 331
  8. 2019Optimal transport mapping via input convex neural networkscited by 202
  9. 2016Stochastic Optimization for Large-scale Optimal Transportcited by 188
  10. 2018Optimal Transport for structured data with application on graphscited by 170
  11. 2022Neural Optimal Transportcited by 123
  12. 2018Improving GANs Using Optimal Transportcited by 122
33 more
  1. 2018Gromov-Wasserstein Alignment of Word Embedding Spacescited by 119
  2. 2020Graph Optimal Transport for Cross-Domain Alignmentcited by 103
  3. 2019Scalable Gromov-Wasserstein Learning for Graph Partitioning and Matchingcited by 102
  4. 2018Unsupervised Alignment of Embeddings with Wasserstein Procrustescited by 96
  5. 2019Wasserstein-2 Generative Networkscited by 96
  6. 2022Optimal Transport Tools (OTT): A JAX Toolbox for all things Wassersteincited by 96
  7. 2021Do Neural Optimal Transport Solvers Work? A Continuous Wasserstein-2 Benchmarkcited by 95
  8. 2021Entropic estimation of optimal transport mapscited by 87
  9. 2021Generative Modeling with Optimal Transport Mapscited by 80
  10. 2019Trivializations for Gradient-Based Optimization on Manifoldscited by 78
  11. 2018Optimal Transport for Multi-source Domain Adaptation under Target Shiftcited by 67
  12. 2019Sliced Gromov-Wassersteincited by 66
  13. 2021Linear-Time Gromov Wasserstein Distances using Low Rank Couplings and Costscited by 61
  14. 2021Score-based Generative Neural Networks for Large-Scale Optimal Transportcited by 59
  15. 2020The Unbalanced Gromov Wasserstein Distance: Conic Formulation and Relaxationcited by 55
  16. 2017BPEmb: Tokenization-free Pre-trained Subword Embeddings in 275 Languagescited by 52
  17. 2021Continuous Wasserstein-2 Barycenter Estimation without Minimax Optimizationcited by 50
  18. 2022Entropic Neural Optimal Transport via Diffusion Processescited by 49
  19. 2021Neural Monge Map estimation and its applicationscited by 40
  20. 2020Generalized Spectral Clustering via Gromov-Wasserstein Learningcited by 37
  21. 2021Online Graph Dictionary Learningcited by 37
  22. 2020Learning Graphons via Structured Gromov-Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 36
  23. 2022Neural Optimal Transport with General Cost Functionalscited by 34
  24. 2023The Monge Gap: A Regularizer to Learn All Transport Mapscited by 32
  25. 2022Kernel Neural Optimal Transportcited by 31
  26. 2018Existence, Duality, and Cyclical monotonicity for weak transport costscited by 21
  27. 2021On a linear Gromov-Wasserstein distancecited by 17
  28. 2022On the existence of Monge maps for the Gromov-Wasserstein problemcited by 16
  29. 2020A contribution to Optimal Transport on incomparable spacescited by 14
  30. 2016Optimal spectral transportation with application to music transcriptioncited by 11
  31. 2021Reversible Gromov-Monge Sampler for Simulation-Based Inferencecited by 10
  32. 2022Quantized Wasserstein Procrustes Alignment of Word Embedding Spacescited by 6
  33. 2021Cycle Consistent Probability Divergences Across Different Spacescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

6 papers.