Uncovering Challenges of Solving the Continuous Gromov-Wasserstein Problem
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently, the Gromov-Wasserstein Optimal Transport (GWOT) problem has attracted the special attention of the ML community. In this problem, given two distributions supported on two (possibly different) spaces, one has to find the most isometric map between them. In the discrete variant of GWOT, the task is to learn an assignment between given discrete sets of points. In the more advanced continuous formulation, one aims at recovering a parametric mapping between unknown continuous distributions based on i.i.d. samples derived from them. The clear geometrical intuition behind the GWOT makes it a natural choice for several practical use cases, giving rise to a number of proposed solvers. Some of them claim to solve the continuous version of the problem. At the same time, GWOT is notoriously hard, both theoretically and numerically. Moreover, all existing continuous GWOT solvers still heavily rely on discrete techniques. Natural questions arise: to what extent do existing methods unravel the GWOT problem, what difficulties do they encounter, and under which conditions they are successful? Our benchmark paper is an attempt to answer these questions. We specifically focus on the continuous GWOT as the most interesting and debatable setup. We crash-test existing continuous GWOT approaches on different scenarios, carefully record and analyze the obtained results, and identify issues. Our findings experimentally testify that the scientific community is still missing a reliable continuous GWOT solver, which necessitates further research efforts. As the first step in this direction, we propose a new continuous GWOT method which does not rely on discrete techniques and partially solves some of the problems of the competitors.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2023.
Builds on
45 of 86 references.
References · 45
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
- 2018Computational Optimal Transportcited by 765
- 2018Which Training Methods for GANs do actually Converge?cited by 672
- 2017Word Translation Without Parallel Datacited by 480
- 2015Optimal Transport for Domain Adaptationcited by 457
- 2016FastText.zip: Compressing text classification modelscited by 331
- 2019Optimal transport mapping via input convex neural networkscited by 202
- 2016Stochastic Optimization for Large-scale Optimal Transportcited by 188
- 2018Optimal Transport for structured data with application on graphscited by 170
- 2022Neural Optimal Transportcited by 123
- 2018Improving GANs Using Optimal Transportcited by 122
33 more
- 2018Gromov-Wasserstein Alignment of Word Embedding Spacescited by 119
- 2020Graph Optimal Transport for Cross-Domain Alignmentcited by 103
- 2019Scalable Gromov-Wasserstein Learning for Graph Partitioning and Matchingcited by 102
- 2018Unsupervised Alignment of Embeddings with Wasserstein Procrustescited by 96
- 2019Wasserstein-2 Generative Networkscited by 96
- 2022Optimal Transport Tools (OTT): A JAX Toolbox for all things Wassersteincited by 96
- 2021Do Neural Optimal Transport Solvers Work? A Continuous Wasserstein-2 Benchmarkcited by 95
- 2021Entropic estimation of optimal transport mapscited by 87
- 2021Generative Modeling with Optimal Transport Mapscited by 80
- 2019Trivializations for Gradient-Based Optimization on Manifoldscited by 78
- 2018Optimal Transport for Multi-source Domain Adaptation under Target Shiftcited by 67
- 2019Sliced Gromov-Wassersteincited by 66
- 2021Linear-Time Gromov Wasserstein Distances using Low Rank Couplings and Costscited by 61
- 2021Score-based Generative Neural Networks for Large-Scale Optimal Transportcited by 59
- 2020The Unbalanced Gromov Wasserstein Distance: Conic Formulation and Relaxationcited by 55
- 2017BPEmb: Tokenization-free Pre-trained Subword Embeddings in 275 Languagescited by 52
- 2021Continuous Wasserstein-2 Barycenter Estimation without Minimax Optimizationcited by 50
- 2022Entropic Neural Optimal Transport via Diffusion Processescited by 49
- 2021Neural Monge Map estimation and its applicationscited by 40
- 2020Generalized Spectral Clustering via Gromov-Wasserstein Learningcited by 37
- 2021Online Graph Dictionary Learningcited by 37
- 2020Learning Graphons via Structured Gromov-Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 36
- 2022Neural Optimal Transport with General Cost Functionalscited by 34
- 2023The Monge Gap: A Regularizer to Learn All Transport Mapscited by 32
- 2022Kernel Neural Optimal Transportcited by 31
- 2018Existence, Duality, and Cyclical monotonicity for weak transport costscited by 21
- 2021On a linear Gromov-Wasserstein distancecited by 17
- 2022On the existence of Monge maps for the Gromov-Wasserstein problemcited by 16
- 2020A contribution to Optimal Transport on incomparable spacescited by 14
- 2016Optimal spectral transportation with application to music transcriptioncited by 11
- 2021Reversible Gromov-Monge Sampler for Simulation-Based Inferencecited by 10
- 2022Quantized Wasserstein Procrustes Alignment of Word Embedding Spacescited by 6
- 2021Cycle Consistent Probability Divergences Across Different Spacescited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2023Structured Transforms Across Spaces with Cost-Regularized Optimal Transportcited by 8
- 2024Disentangled Representation Learning with the Gromov-Monge Gapcited by 3
- 2023GeRA: Label-Efficient Geometrically Regularized Alignmentcited by 2
- 2025A Statistical Learning Perspective on Semi-dual Adversarial Neural Optimal Transport Solverscited by 2
- 2026Sliced Inner Product Gromov-Wasserstein Distancescited by 1
- 2025Expressive Score-Based Priors for Distribution Matching with Geometry-Preserving Regularizationcited by 0
- 2026Sliced Inner Product Gromov-Wasserstein Distances8 May 2026
- 2025Expressive Score-Based Priors for Distribution Matching with Geometry-Preserving Regularization17 Jun 2025
- 2025A Statistical Learning Perspective on Semi-dual Adversarial Neural Optimal Transport Solvers3 Feb 2025
- 2024Disentangled Representation Learning with the Gromov-Monge Gap10 Jul 2024
- 2023Structured Transforms Across Spaces with Cost-Regularized Optimal Transport9 Nov 2023
- 2023GeRA: Label-Efficient Geometrically Regularized Alignment1 Oct 2023