mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Revisiting Counterfactual Regression through the Lens of Gromov-Wasserstein Information Bottleneck

arXiv 2405.15505 ↗First posted 24 May 2024cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As a promising individualized treatment effect (ITE) estimation method, counterfactual regression (CFR) maps individuals' covariates to a latent space and predicts their counterfactual outcomes. However, the selection bias between control and treatment groups often imbalances the two groups' latent distributions and negatively impacts this method's performance. In this study, we revisit counterfactual regression through the lens of information bottleneck and propose a novel learning paradigm called Gromov-Wasserstein information bottleneck (GWIB). In this paradigm, we learn CFR by maximizing the mutual information between covariates' latent representations and outcomes while penalizing the kernelized mutual information between the latent representations and the covariates. We demonstrate that the upper bound of the penalty term can be implemented as a new regularizer consisting of i) the fused Gromov-Wasserstein distance between the latent representations of different groups and ii) the gap between the transport cost generated by the model and the cross-group Gromov-Wasserstein distance between the latent representations and the covariates. GWIB effectively learns the CFR model through alternating optimization, suppressing selection bias while avoiding trivial latent distributions. Experiments on ITE estimation tasks show that GWIB consistently outperforms state-of-the-art CFR methods. To promote the research community, we release our project at https://github.com/peteryang1031/Causal-GWIB.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2024.

Builds on

22 of 51 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Machine Learningcited by 478
  2. 2016Learning Representations for Counterfactual Inferencecited by 329
  3. 2020A Brief Review of Domain Adaptationcited by 288
  4. 2019Adapting Neural Networks for the Estimation of Treatment Effectscited by 287
  5. 2020A Survey on Causal Inferencecited by 202
  6. 2018Optimal Transport for structured data with application on graphscited by 172
  7. 2020Estimating Counterfactual Treatment Outcomes over Time Through Adversarially Balanced Representationscited by 155
  8. 2017Automated versus do-it-yourself methods for causal inference: Lessons learned from a data analysis competitioncited by 106
  9. 2019Wasserstein Dependency Measure for Representation Learningcited by 69
  10. 2016Convergence Rate of Frank-Wolfe for Non-Convex Objectivescited by 63
  11. 2019Learning Individual Causal Effects from Networked Observational Datacited by 56
  12. 2020Counterfactual Representation Learning with Balancing Weightscited by 45
10 more
  1. 2018Learning Weighted Representations for Generalization Across Designscited by 41
  2. 2023The Monge Gap: A Regularizer to Learn All Transport Mapscited by 32
  3. 2023Optimal Transport for Treatment Effect Estimationcited by 32
  4. 2016Regularized Optimal Transport and the Rot Mover's Distancecited by 24
  5. 2022InfoOT: Information Maximizing Optimal Transportcited by 9
  6. 2021Optimal transport weights for causal inferencecited by 7
  7. 2021Deep Treatment-Adaptive Network for Causal Inferencecited by 5
  8. 2023Robustness-enhanced Uplift Modeling with Adversarial Feature Desensitizationcited by 5
  9. 2021Causal Effect Estimation using Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 4
  10. 2019Reliable Estimation of Individual Treatment Effect with Causal Information Bottleneckcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

4 papers.