Displacement-Sparse Neural Optimal Transport
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Optimal transport (OT) aims to find a map T that transports mass from one probability measure to another while minimizing a cost function. Recently, neural OT solvers have gained popularity in high dimensional biological applications such as drug perturbation, due to their superior computational and memory efficiency compared to traditional exact Sinkhorn solvers. However, the overly complex high dimensional maps learned by neural OT solvers often suffer from poor interpretability. Prior work addressed this issue in the context of exact OT solvers by introducing displacement-sparse maps via designed elastic cost, but such method failed to be applied to neural OT settings. In this work, we propose an intuitive and theoretically grounded approach to learning displacement-sparse maps within neural OT solvers. Building on our new formulation, we introduce a novel smoothed ℓ0 regularizer that outperforms the ℓ1 based alternative from prior work. Leveraging Input Convex Neural Network's flexibility, we further develop a heuristic framework for adaptively controlling sparsity intensity, an approach uniquely enabled by the neural OT paradigm. We demonstrate the necessity of this adaptive framework in large-scale, high-dimensional training, showing not only improved accuracy but also practical ease of use for downstream applications.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2025.
Builds on
25 of 53 references.
References · 25
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
- 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,223
- 2016Input Convex Neural Networkscited by 407
- 2019Optimal transport mapping via input convex neural networkscited by 202
- 2019Wasserstein-2 Generative Networkscited by 96
- 2022Optimal Transport Tools (OTT): A JAX Toolbox for all things Wassersteincited by 96
- 2021Do Neural Optimal Transport Solvers Work? A Continuous Wasserstein-2 Benchmarkcited by 95
- 2017Smooth and Sparse Optimal Transportcited by 83
- 2021Large-Scale Wasserstein Gradient Flowscited by 76
- 2022Supervised Training of Conditional Monge Mapscited by 60
- 2021Optimizing Functionals on the Space of Probabilities with Input Convex Neural Networkscited by 53
- 2018Improving the Improved Training of Wasserstein GANs: A Consistency Term and Its Dual Effectcited by 49
13 more
- 2020Scalable Computations of Wasserstein Barycenter via Input Convex Neural Networkscited by 49
- 2020Improved Algorithms for Convex-Concave Minimax Optimizationcited by 34
- 2022Neural Optimal Transport with General Cost Functionalscited by 34
- 20192-Wasserstein Approximation via Restricted Convex Potentials with Application to Improved Training for GANscited by 32
- 2022Sparsity-Constrained Optimal Transportcited by 32
- 2023The Monge Gap: A Regularizer to Learn All Transport Mapscited by 32
- 2023Learning Elastic Costs to Shape Monge Displacementscited by 6
- 2024ENOT: Expectile Regularization for Fast and Accurate Training of Neural Optimal Transportcited by 6
- 2021Optimal transport with f-divergence regularization and generalized Sinkhorn algorithmcited by 4
- 2024Sparsity of Quadratically Regularized Optimal Transport: Scalar Casecited by 4
- 2024Quadratically Regularized Optimal Transport: Existence and Multiplicity of Potentialscited by 3
- 2024Fast and scalable Wasserstein-1 neural optimal transport solver for single-cell perturbation predictioncited by 3
- 2023Manifold Learning with Sparse Regularised Optimal Transportcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.