mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Progressive Entropic Optimal Transport Solvers

arXiv 2406.05061 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2024stat.ML cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Optimal transport (OT) has profoundly impacted machine learning by providing theoretical and computational tools to realign datasets. In this context, given two large point clouds of sizes n and m in ℝd, entropic OT (EOT) solvers have emerged as the most reliable tool to either solve the Kantorovich problem and output a n× m coupling matrix, or to solve the Monge problem and learn a vector-valued push-forward map. While the robustness of EOT couplings/maps makes them a go-to choice in practical applications, EOT solvers remain difficult to tune because of a small but influential set of hyperparameters, notably the omnipresent entropic regularization strength varepsilon. Setting varepsilon can be difficult, as it simultaneously impacts various performance metrics, such as compute speed, statistical performance, generalization, and bias. In this work, we propose a new class of EOT solvers (ProgOT), that can estimate both plans and transport maps. We take advantage of several opportunities to optimize the computation of EOT solutions by dividing mass displacement using a time discretization, borrowing inspiration from dynamic OT formulations, and conquering each of these steps using EOT with properly scheduled parameters. We provide experimental evidence demonstrating that ProgOT is a faster and more robust alternative to standard solvers when computing couplings at large scales, even outperforming neural network-based approaches. We also prove statistical consistency of our approach for estimating optimal transport maps.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2024.

Builds on

30 of 62 references.

References · 30

  1. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
  2. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
  3. 2023Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transportcited by 835
  4. 2016Input Convex Neural Networkscited by 407
  5. 2017Learning Generative Models with Sinkhorn Divergencescited by 310
  6. 2022Rectified Flow: A Marginal Preserving Approach to Optimal Transportcited by 277
  7. 2023Multisample Flow Matching: Straightening Flows with Minibatch Couplingscited by 267
  8. 2017Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iterationcited by 219
  9. 2015On Wasserstein Two Sample Testing and Related Families of Nonparametric Testscited by 165
  10. 2019Differentiable Ranks and Sorting using Optimal Transportcited by 113
  11. 2022Optimal Transport Tools (OTT): A JAX Toolbox for all things Wassersteincited by 96
  12. 2021Do Neural Optimal Transport Solvers Work? A Continuous Wasserstein-2 Benchmarkcited by 95
18 more
  1. 2021Entropic estimation of optimal transport mapscited by 87
  2. 2019Statistical bounds for entropic optimal transport: sample complexity and the central limit theoremcited by 85
  3. 2016Stabilized Sparse Scaling Algorithms for Entropy Regularized Transport Problemscited by 69
  4. 2021Plugin Estimation of Smooth Optimal Transport Mapscited by 67
  5. 2021Low-Rank Sinkhorn Factorizationcited by 66
  6. 2021Linear-Time Gromov Wasserstein Distances using Low Rank Couplings and Costscited by 61
  7. 2019On the Efficiency of Entropic Regularized Algorithms for Optimal Transportcited by 34
  8. 2023The Monge Gap: A Regularizer to Learn All Transport Mapscited by 32
  9. 2022On amortizing convex conjugates for optimal transportcited by 30
  10. 2021Stability of Entropic Optimal Transport and Schr"odinger Bridgescited by 25
  11. 2021Quantitative Stability of Regularized Optimal Transport and Convergence of Sinkhorn's Algorithmcited by 21
  12. 2017Overrelaxed Sinkhorn-Knopp Algorithm for Regularized Optimal Transportcited by 16
  13. 2023Monge, Bregman and Occam: Interpretable Optimal Transport in High-Dimensions with Feature-Sparse Mapscited by 16
  14. 2022Rethinking Initialization of the Sinkhorn Algorithmcited by 14
  15. 2022Displacement smoothness of entropic optimal transportcited by 13
  16. 2020A note on overrelaxation in the Sinkhorn algorithmcited by 6
  17. 2022Debiaser Beware: Pitfalls of Centering Regularized Transport Mapscited by 6
  18. 2023Optimal Transport with Adaptive Regularisationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 4.

10 papers.