OBMO: One Bounding Box Multiple Objects for Monocular 3D Object Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Compared to typical multi-sensor systems, monocular 3D object detection has attracted much attention due to its simple configuration. However, there is still a significant gap between LiDAR-based and monocular-based methods. In this paper, we find that the ill-posed nature of monocular imagery can lead to depth ambiguity. Specifically, objects with different depths can appear with the same bounding boxes and similar visual features in the 2D image. Unfortunately, the network cannot accurately distinguish different depths from such non-discriminative visual features, resulting in unstable depth training. To facilitate depth learning, we propose a simple yet effective plug-and-play module, underlineOne underlineBounding Box underlineMultiple underlineObjects (OBMO). Concretely, we add a set of suitable pseudo labels by shifting the 3D bounding box along the viewing frustum. To constrain the pseudo-3D labels to be reasonable, we carefully design two label scoring strategies to represent their quality. In contrast to the original hard depth labels, such soft pseudo labels with quality scores allow the network to learn a reasonable depth range, boosting training stability and thus improving final performance. Extensive experiments on KITTI and Waymo benchmarks show that our method significantly improves state-of-the-art monocular 3D detectors by a significant margin (The improvements under the moderate setting on KITTI validation set are 1.82~ 10.91% mAP in BEV and 1.18~ 9.36% mAP in 3D). Codes have been released at urlhttps://github.com/mrsempress/OBMO.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2022.
Builds on
52 of 64 references.
References · 52
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
- 2019Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Datasetcited by 2,451
- 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,715
- 2017VoxelNet: End-to-End Learning for Point Cloud Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 1,323
- 2018PointRCNN: 3D Object Proposal Generation and Detection from Point Cloudcited by 941
- 2019PV-RCNN: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3D Object Detectioncited by 891
- 2020PCT: Point cloud transformercited by 732
- 2016Multi-View 3D Object Detection Network for Autonomous Drivingcited by 724
- 2018Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Drivingcited by 457
- 20203DSSD: Point-based 3D Single Stage Object Detectorcited by 440
38 more
- 2020Voxel R-CNN: Towards High Performance Voxel-based 3D Object Detectioncited by 410
- 2020Point-GNN: Graph Neural Network for 3D Object Detection in a Point Cloudcited by 335
- 2021Categorical Depth Distribution Network for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 327
- 20163D Bounding Box Estimation Using Deep Learning and Geometrycited by 278
- 2019M3D-RPN: Monocular 3D Region Proposal Network for Object Detectioncited by 252
- 2021Is Pseudo-Lidar needed for Monocular 3D Object detection?cited by 249
- 2015DeepDriving: Learning Affordance for Direct Perception in Autonomous Drivingcited by 231
- 2022Visual Attention Networkcited by 210
- 2017Large Kernel Matters -- Improve Semantic Segmentation by Global Convolutional Networkcited by 208
- 2020SMOKE: Single-Stage Monocular 3D Object Detection via Keypoint Estimationcited by 204
- 2019Pseudo-LiDAR++: Accurate Depth for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Drivingcited by 188
- 2021Objects are Different: Flexible Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 185
- 2017Computer Vision for Autonomous Vehicles: Problems, Datasets and State of the Artcited by 182
- 2019Learning Depth-Guided Convolutions for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 169
- 2021Geometry Uncertainty Projection Network for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 156
- 2020MonoPair: Monocular 3D Object Detection Using Pairwise Spatial Relationshipscited by 153
- 2020RTM3D: Real-time Monocular 3D Detection from Object Keypoints for Autonomous Drivingcited by 150
- 2021Delving into Localization Errors for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 140
- 2021SE-SSD: Self-Ensembling Single-Stage Object Detector From Point Cloudcited by 119
- 2020Rethinking Pseudo-LiDAR Representationcited by 109
- 2022MonoDTR: Monocular 3D Object Detection with Depth-Aware Transformercited by 109
- 2021SPG: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for 3D Object Detection via Semantic Point Generationcited by 94
- 2018MonoGRNet: A Geometric Reasoning Network for Monocular 3D Object Localizationcited by 84
- 2021Geometry-based Distance Decomposition for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 84
- 2021MonoRUn: Monocular 3D Object Detection by Reconstruction and Uncertainty Propagationcited by 82
- 2021Monocular 3D Object Detection: An Extrinsic Parameter Free Approachcited by 69
- 2021Learning Auxiliary Monocular Contexts Helps Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 67
- 2021GrooMeD-NMS: Grouped Mathematically Differentiable NMS for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 66
- 2021Ground-aware Monocular 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Drivingcited by 65
- 2021Behind the Curtain: Learning Occluded Shapes for 3D Object Detectioncited by 58
- 2021Progressive Coordinate Transforms for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 52
- 2020Monocular 3D Object Detection with Decoupled Structured Polygon Estimation and Height-Guided Depth Estimationcited by 43
- 2019Mono3D++: Monocular 3D Vehicle Detection with Two-Scale 3D Hypotheses and Task Priorscited by 37
- 2022MonoJSG: Joint Semantic and Geometric Cost Volume for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 30
- 2019Shift R-CNN: Deep Monocular 3D Object Detection with Closed-Form Geometric Constraintscited by 25
- 2020Center3D: Center-based Monocular 3D Object Detection with Joint Depth Understandingcited by 25
- 2022Homography Loss for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 24
- 2020Monocular Differentiable Rendering for Self-Supervised 3D Object Detectioncited by 23
50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023SparseFusion: Fusing Multi-Modal Sparse Representations for Multi-Sensor 3D Object Detectioncited by 83
- 2023Camera-based 3D Semantic Scene Completion with Sparse Guidance Networkcited by 40
- 2025Extending Large Vision-Language Model for Diverse Interactive Tasks in Autonomous Drivingcited by 10
- 2025Revisiting Radar Camera Alignment by Contrastive Learning for 3D Object Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Multi-Modal Decouple and Recouple Network for Robust 3D Object Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Multi-Modal Decouple and Recouple Network for Robust 3D Object Detection8 Mar 2026
- 2025Extending Large Vision-Language Model for Diverse Interactive Tasks in Autonomous Driving13 May 2025
- 2025Revisiting Radar Camera Alignment by Contrastive Learning for 3D Object Detection23 Apr 2025
- 2023Camera-based 3D Semantic Scene Completion with Sparse Guidance Network10 Dec 2023
- 2023SparseFusion: Fusing Multi-Modal Sparse Representations for Multi-Sensor 3D Object Detection27 Apr 2023