mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

OBMO: One Bounding Box Multiple Objects for Monocular 3D Object Detection

arXiv 2212.10049 ↗First posted 20 Dec 2022cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Compared to typical multi-sensor systems, monocular 3D object detection has attracted much attention due to its simple configuration. However, there is still a significant gap between LiDAR-based and monocular-based methods. In this paper, we find that the ill-posed nature of monocular imagery can lead to depth ambiguity. Specifically, objects with different depths can appear with the same bounding boxes and similar visual features in the 2D image. Unfortunately, the network cannot accurately distinguish different depths from such non-discriminative visual features, resulting in unstable depth training. To facilitate depth learning, we propose a simple yet effective plug-and-play module, underlineOne underlineBounding Box underlineMultiple underlineObjects (OBMO). Concretely, we add a set of suitable pseudo labels by shifting the 3D bounding box along the viewing frustum. To constrain the pseudo-3D labels to be reasonable, we carefully design two label scoring strategies to represent their quality. In contrast to the original hard depth labels, such soft pseudo labels with quality scores allow the network to learn a reasonable depth range, boosting training stability and thus improving final performance. Extensive experiments on KITTI and Waymo benchmarks show that our method significantly improves state-of-the-art monocular 3D detectors by a significant margin (The improvements under the moderate setting on KITTI validation set are 1.82~ 10.91% mAP in BEV and 1.18~ 9.36% mAP in 3D). Codes have been released at urlhttps://github.com/mrsempress/OBMO.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2022.

Builds on

52 of 64 references.

References · 52

  1. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  2. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  3. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
  4. 2019Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Datasetcited by 2,451
  5. 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,715
  6. 2017VoxelNet: End-to-End Learning for Point Cloud Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 1,323
  7. 2018PointRCNN: 3D Object Proposal Generation and Detection from Point Cloudcited by 941
  8. 2019PV-RCNN: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3D Object Detectioncited by 891
  9. 2020PCT: Point cloud transformercited by 732
  10. 2016Multi-View 3D Object Detection Network for Autonomous Drivingcited by 724
  11. 2018Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Drivingcited by 457
  12. 20203DSSD: Point-based 3D Single Stage Object Detectorcited by 440
38 more
  1. 2020Voxel R-CNN: Towards High Performance Voxel-based 3D Object Detectioncited by 410
  2. 2020Point-GNN: Graph Neural Network for 3D Object Detection in a Point Cloudcited by 335
  3. 2021Categorical Depth Distribution Network for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 327
  4. 20163D Bounding Box Estimation Using Deep Learning and Geometrycited by 278
  5. 2019M3D-RPN: Monocular 3D Region Proposal Network for Object Detectioncited by 252
  6. 2021Is Pseudo-Lidar needed for Monocular 3D Object detection?cited by 249
  7. 2015DeepDriving: Learning Affordance for Direct Perception in Autonomous Drivingcited by 231
  8. 2022Visual Attention Networkcited by 210
  9. 2017Large Kernel Matters -- Improve Semantic Segmentation by Global Convolutional Networkcited by 208
  10. 2020SMOKE: Single-Stage Monocular 3D Object Detection via Keypoint Estimationcited by 204
  11. 2019Pseudo-LiDAR++: Accurate Depth for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Drivingcited by 188
  12. 2021Objects are Different: Flexible Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 185
  13. 2017Computer Vision for Autonomous Vehicles: Problems, Datasets and State of the Artcited by 182
  14. 2019Learning Depth-Guided Convolutions for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 169
  15. 2021Geometry Uncertainty Projection Network for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 156
  16. 2020MonoPair: Monocular 3D Object Detection Using Pairwise Spatial Relationshipscited by 153
  17. 2020RTM3D: Real-time Monocular 3D Detection from Object Keypoints for Autonomous Drivingcited by 150
  18. 2021Delving into Localization Errors for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 140
  19. 2021SE-SSD: Self-Ensembling Single-Stage Object Detector From Point Cloudcited by 119
  20. 2020Rethinking Pseudo-LiDAR Representationcited by 109
  21. 2022MonoDTR: Monocular 3D Object Detection with Depth-Aware Transformercited by 109
  22. 2021SPG: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for 3D Object Detection via Semantic Point Generationcited by 94
  23. 2018MonoGRNet: A Geometric Reasoning Network for Monocular 3D Object Localizationcited by 84
  24. 2021Geometry-based Distance Decomposition for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 84
  25. 2021MonoRUn: Monocular 3D Object Detection by Reconstruction and Uncertainty Propagationcited by 82
  26. 2021Monocular 3D Object Detection: An Extrinsic Parameter Free Approachcited by 69
  27. 2021Learning Auxiliary Monocular Contexts Helps Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 67
  28. 2021GrooMeD-NMS: Grouped Mathematically Differentiable NMS for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 66
  29. 2021Ground-aware Monocular 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Drivingcited by 65
  30. 2021Behind the Curtain: Learning Occluded Shapes for 3D Object Detectioncited by 58
  31. 2021Progressive Coordinate Transforms for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 52
  32. 2020Monocular 3D Object Detection with Decoupled Structured Polygon Estimation and Height-Guided Depth Estimationcited by 43
  33. 2019Mono3D++: Monocular 3D Vehicle Detection with Two-Scale 3D Hypotheses and Task Priorscited by 37
  34. 2022MonoJSG: Joint Semantic and Geometric Cost Volume for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 30
  35. 2019Shift R-CNN: Deep Monocular 3D Object Detection with Closed-Form Geometric Constraintscited by 25
  36. 2020Center3D: Center-based Monocular 3D Object Detection with Joint Depth Understandingcited by 25
  37. 2022Homography Loss for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 24
  38. 2020Monocular Differentiable Rendering for Self-Supervised 3D Object Detectioncited by 23

50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.