mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Estimation of Fair Ranking Metrics with Incomplete Judgments

arXiv 2108.05152 ↗First posted 11 Aug 2021cs.IR cs.CY cs.LGcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There is increasing attention to evaluating the fairness of search system ranking decisions. These metrics often consider the membership of items to particular groups, often identified using protected attributes such as gender or ethnicity. To date, these metrics typically assume the availability and completeness of protected attribute labels of items. However, the protected attributes of individuals are rarely present, limiting the application of fair ranking metrics in large scale systems. In order to address this problem, we propose a sampling strategy and estimation technique for four fair ranking metrics. We formulate a robust and unbiased estimator which can operate even with very limited number of labeled items. We evaluate our approach using both simulated and real world data. Our experimental results demonstrate that our method can estimate this family of fair ranking metrics and provides a robust, reliable alternative to exhaustive or random data annotation.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2021.

Builds on

16 of 45 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 364
  3. 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
  4. 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
  5. 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 190
  6. 2019Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisonscited by 127
  7. 2018Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankingscited by 124
  8. 2017FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithmcited by 113
  9. 2016Measuring Fairness in Ranked Outputscited by 81
  10. 2019Assessing Algorithmic Fairness with Unobserved Protected Class Using Data Combinationcited by 79
  11. 2017Ranking with Fairness Constraintscited by 78
  12. 2017Multisided Fairness for Recommendationcited by 70
4 more
  1. 2020Controlling Fairness and Bias in Dynamic Learning-to-Rankcited by 68
  2. 2020Evaluating Stochastic Rankings with Expected Exposurecited by 53
  3. 2018Exploring Author Gender in Book Rating and Recommendationcited by 29
  4. 2020Overview of the TREC 2019 Fair Ranking Trackcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 7; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: