mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Equal Experience in Recommender Systems

arXiv 2210.05936 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2022cs.LG cs.IR stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We explore the fairness issue that arises in recommender systems. Biased data due to inherent stereotypes of particular groups (e.g., male students' average rating on mathematics is often higher than that on humanities, and vice versa for females) may yield a limited scope of suggested items to a certain group of users. Our main contribution lies in the introduction of a novel fairness notion (that we call equal experience), which can serve to regulate such unfairness in the presence of biased data. The notion captures the degree of the equal experience of item recommendations across distinct groups. We propose an optimization framework that incorporates the fairness notion as a regularization term, as well as introduce computationally-efficient algorithms that solve the optimization. Experiments on synthetic and benchmark real datasets demonstrate that the proposed framework can indeed mitigate such unfairness while exhibiting a minor degradation of recommendation accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2022.

Builds on

21 of 56 references.

References · 21

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  4. 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,108
  5. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  6. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  7. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  8. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
  9. 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 246
  10. 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
  11. 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 189
  12. 2018Counterfactual Fairness in Text Classification through Robustnesscited by 150
9 more
  1. 2017Fair Inference On Outcomescited by 143
  2. 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
  3. 2019Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisonscited by 127
  4. 2018Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankingscited by 124
  5. 2017FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithmcited by 113
  6. 2017Beyond Parity: Fairness Objectives for Collaborative Filteringcited by 93
  7. 2021User-oriented Fairness in Recommendationcited by 75
  8. 2017Multisided Fairness for Recommendationcited by 69
  9. 2019Pairwise Fairness for Ranking and Regressioncited by 58

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.