mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

When the Server Steps In: Calibrated Updates for Fair Federated Learning

arXiv 2601.05352 ↗First posted 8 Jan 2026cs.LG cs.CR cs.IRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a transformative distributed learning paradigm, enabling multiple clients to collaboratively train a global model under the coordination of a central server without sharing their raw training data. While FL offers notable advantages, it faces critical challenges in ensuring fairness across diverse demographic groups. To address these fairness concerns, various fairness-aware debiasing methods have been proposed. However, many of these approaches either require modifications to clients' training protocols or lack flexibility in their aggregation strategies. In this work, we address these limitations by introducing EquFL, a novel server-side debiasing method designed to mitigate bias in FL systems. EquFL operates by allowing the server to generate a single calibrated update after receiving model updates from the clients. This calibrated update is then integrated with the aggregated client updates to produce an adjusted global model that reduces bias. Theoretically, we establish that EquFL converges to the optimal global model achieved by FedAvg and effectively reduces fairness loss over training rounds. Empirically, we demonstrate that EquFL significantly mitigates bias within the system, showcasing its practical effectiveness.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2026.

Builds on

46 of 68 references.

References · 46

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  4. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  5. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  6. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  7. 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,220
  8. 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 698
  9. 2020Ditto: Fair and Robust Federated Learning Through Personalizationcited by 665
  10. 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 479
  11. 2019Agnostic Federated Learningcited by 451
  12. 2022Dataset Distillation by Matching Training Trajectoriescited by 437
34 more
  1. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  2. 2019Fair Resource Allocation in Federated Learningcited by 389
  3. 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 330
  4. 2022Dataset Condensation via Efficient Synthetic-Data Parameterizationcited by 187
  5. 2019On the Apparent Conflict Between Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 126
  6. 2020Byzantine-Robust Learning on Heterogeneous Datasets via Bucketingcited by 125
  7. 2021Back to the Drawing Board: A Critical Evaluation of Poisoning Attacks on Production Federated Learningcited by 116
  8. 2021FairFed: Enabling Group Fairness in Federated Learningcited by 114
  9. 2020FairBatch: Batch Selection for Model Fairnesscited by 99
  10. 2022DeepSight: Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning Through Deep Model Inspectioncited by 78
  11. 2017Distributed Statistical Machine Learning in Adversarial Settings: Byzantine Gradient Descentcited by 59
  12. 2021Towards Fairness-Aware Federated Learningcited by 57
  13. 2020Mitigating Bias in Federated Learningcited by 56
  14. 2024Byzantine-Robust Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 47
  15. 2021Improving Fairness via Federated Learningcited by 39
  16. 2023Eliminating Domain Bias for Federated Learning in Representation Spacecited by 38
  17. 2022FedBR: Improving Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Data via Local Learning Bias Reductioncited by 35
  18. 2022AFLGuard: Byzantine-robust Asynchronous Federated Learningcited by 29
  19. 2023Privacy and Fairness in Federated Learning: on the Perspective of Trade-offcited by 26
  20. 2021Improving Fairness for Data Valuation in Horizontal Federated Learningcited by 22
  21. 2022Optimising Equal Opportunity Fairness in Model Trainingcited by 22
  22. 2021Unified Group Fairness on Federated Learningcited by 15
  23. 2025Do We Really Need to Design New Byzantine-robust Aggregation Rules?cited by 13
  24. 2023Bias Propagation in Federated Learningcited by 12
  25. 2023Federated Multi-Objective Learningcited by 11
  26. 2024Poisoning Attacks on Federated Learning-based Wireless Traffic Predictioncited by 10
  27. 2025Provably Robust Federated Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
  28. 2022Securing Federated Sensitive Topic Classification against Poisoning Attackscited by 6
  29. 2025Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning over Ring-All-Reduce Distributed Computingcited by 6
  30. 2022Trade-offs between Group Fairness Metrics in Societal Resource Allocationcited by 5
  31. 2022FairRoad: Achieving Fairness for Recommender Systems with Optimized Antidote Datacited by 5
  32. 2025Poisoning Attacks and Defenses to Federated Unlearningcited by 5
  33. 2023LR-XFL: Logical Reasoning-based Explainable Federated Learningcited by 4
  34. 2025Uncertainty-Aware Explainable Federated Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.