mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Survey on Fairness-aware Recommender Systems

arXiv 2306.00403 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2023cs.IR cs.AIcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As information filtering services, recommender systems have extremely enriched our daily life by providing personalized suggestions and facilitating people in decision-making, which makes them vital and indispensable to human society in the information era. However, as people become more dependent on them, recent studies show that recommender systems potentially own unintentional impacts on society and individuals because of their unfairness (e.g., gender discrimination in job recommendations). To develop trustworthy services, it is crucial to devise fairness-aware recommender systems that can mitigate these bias issues. In this survey, we summarise existing methodologies and practices of fairness in recommender systems. Firstly, we present concepts of fairness in different recommendation scenarios, comprehensively categorize current advances, and introduce typical methods to promote fairness in different stages of recommender systems. Next, after introducing datasets and evaluation metrics applied to assess the fairness of recommender systems, we will delve into the significant influence that fairness-aware recommender systems exert on real-world industrial applications. Subsequently, we highlight the connection between fairness and other principles of trustworthy recommender systems, aiming to consider trustworthiness principles holistically while advocating for fairness. Finally, we summarize this review, spotlighting promising opportunities in comprehending concepts, frameworks, the balance between accuracy and fairness, and the ties with trustworthiness, with the ultimate goal of fostering the development of fairness-aware recommender systems.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 88 of its 181 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2023.

Builds on

88 of 181 references.

References · 88

  1. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  2. 2020Graph Neural Networks in Recommender Systems: A Surveycited by 493
  3. 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 246
  4. 2020Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directionscited by 239
  5. 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 189
  6. 2019Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Searchcited by 137
  7. 2019Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisonscited by 127
  8. 2018Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankingscited by 124
  9. 2013A Theoretical Analysis of NDCG Type Ranking Measurescited by 119
  10. 2021Advances and Challenges in Conversational Recommender Systems: A Surveycited by 118
  11. 2021Causal Intervention for Leveraging Popularity Bias in Recommendationcited by 116
  12. 2022A Survey on the Fairness of Recommender Systemscited by 102
38 more
  1. 2020Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Reasoning for Eliminating Popularity Bias in Recommender Systemcited by 94
  2. 2021Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspectivecited by 93
  3. 2022Trustworthy Graph Neural Networks: Aspects, Methods and Trendscited by 88
  4. 2014Automated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings: A Tale of Opacity, Choice, and Discriminationcited by 83
  5. 2016Measuring Fairness in Ranked Outputscited by 81
  6. 2019Unbiased Recommender Learning from Missing-Not-At-Random Implicit Feedbackcited by 79
  7. 2020FairRec: Two-Sided Fairness for Personalized Recommendations in Two-Sided Platformscited by 77
  8. 2021Towards Long-term Fairness in Recommendationcited by 77
  9. 2021User-oriented Fairness in Recommendationcited by 75
  10. 2020Fairness-Aware Explainable Recommendation over Knowledge Graphscited by 74
  11. 2019The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Recommendationcited by 68
  12. 2021A Survey on Accuracy-oriented Neural Recommendation: From Collaborative Filtering to Information-rich Recommendationcited by 59
  13. 2021Deconfounded Recommendation for Alleviating Bias Amplificationcited by 51
  14. 2021Learning Fair Representations for Recommendation: A Graph-based Perspectivecited by 50
  15. 2020FairRec: Fairness-aware News Recommendation with Decomposed Adversarial Learningcited by 44
  16. 2022A Survey on Trustworthy Recommender Systemscited by 40
  17. 2020Contrastive Learning for Debiased Candidate Generation in Large-Scale Recommender Systemscited by 38
  18. 2021Personalized Counterfactual Fairness in Recommendationcited by 38
  19. 2018Fighting Fire with Fire: Using Antidote Data to Improve Polarization and Fairness of Recommender Systemscited by 37
  20. 2022Deconfounding Duration Bias in Watch-time Prediction for Video Recommendationcited by 37
  21. 2019Toward a better trade-off between performance and fairness with kernel-based distribution matchingcited by 36
  22. 2020The Connection Between Popularity Bias, Calibration, and Fairness in Recommendationcited by 35
  23. 2020Optimizing Long-term Social Welfare in Recommender Systems: A Constrained Matching Approachcited by 32
  24. 2022Self-Supervised Hypergraph Transformer for Recommender Systemscited by 32
  25. 2022A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Recommender Systemscited by 32
  26. 2021FM2: Field-matrixed Factorization Machines for Recommender Systemscited by 31
  27. 2021TFROM: A Two-sided Fairness-Aware Recommendation Model for Both Customers and Providerscited by 31
  28. 2022Toward Pareto Efficient Fairness-Utility Trade-off inRecommendation through Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
  29. 2022CPFair: Personalized Consumer and Producer Fairness Re-ranking for Recommender Systemscited by 29
  30. 2020How Useful are Reviews for Recommendation? A Critical Review and Potential Improvementscited by 24
  31. 2021SAR-Net: A Scenario-Aware Ranking Network for Personalized Fair Recommendation in Hundreds of Travel Scenarioscited by 23
  32. 2021Online certification of preference-based fairness for personalized recommender systemscited by 22
  33. 2022Joint Multisided Exposure Fairness for Recommendationcited by 22
  34. 2022Trustworthy Recommender Systemscited by 21
  35. 2018User Fairness in Recommender Systemscited by 20
  36. 2019Multi-stakeholder Recommendation and its Connection to Multi-sided Fairnesscited by 19
  37. 2016How to be Fair and Diverse?cited by 18
  38. 2022Comprehensive Fair Meta-learned Recommender Systemcited by 18

50 most cited of 88 All 88 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: