mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Data Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy Protocols

arXiv 1911.02046 ↗First posted 5 Nov 2019cs.CR cs.DCcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Local Differential Privacy (LDP) protocols enable an untrusted data collector to perform privacy-preserving data analytics. In particular, each user locally perturbs its data to preserve privacy before sending it to the data collector, who aggregates the perturbed data to obtain statistics of interest. In the past several years, researchers from multiple communities -- such as security, database, and theoretical computer science -- have proposed many LDP protocols. These studies mainly focused on improving the utility of the LDP protocols. However, the security of LDP protocols is largely unexplored. In this work, we aim to bridge this gap. We focus on LDP protocols for frequency estimation and heavy hitter identification, which are two basic data analytics tasks. Specifically, we show that an attacker can inject fake users into an LDP protocol and the fake users send carefully crafted data to the data collector such that the LDP protocol estimates high frequencies for arbitrary attacker-chosen items or identifies them as heavy hitters. We call our attacks data poisoning attacks. We theoretically and/or empirically show the effectiveness of our attacks. We also explore three countermeasures against our attacks. Our experimental results show that they can effectively defend against our attacks in some scenarios but have limited effectiveness in others, highlighting the needs for new defenses against our attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 7; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Hidden Backdoors in Human-Centric Language Modelscited by 83
  2. 2022Survey on Federated Learning Threats: concepts, taxonomy on attacks and defences, experimental study and challengescited by 81
  3. 2022PoisonedEncoder: Poisoning the Unlabeled Pre-training Data in Contrastive Learningcited by 33
  4. 2023A Survey of What to Share in Federated Learning: Perspectives on Model Utility, Privacy Leakage, and Communication Efficiencycited by 21
  5. 2022Regression with Label Differential Privacycited by 14
  6. 2022Byzantines can also Learn from History: Fall of Centered Clipping in Federated Learningcited by 8
  7. 2022Degree-Preserving Randomized Response for Graph Neural Networks under Local Differential Privacycited by 7
  8. 2023Optimal Unbiased Randomizers for Regression with Label Differential Privacycited by 6
  9. 202110 Security and Privacy Problems in Large Foundation Modelscited by 5
  10. 2022SafeNet: The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Ensembles in Private Collaborative Learningcited by 5
  11. 2022FairRoad: Achieving Fairness for Recommender Systems with Optimized Antidote Datacited by 5
  12. 2021PRECAD: Privacy-Preserving and Robust Federated Learning via Crypto-Aided Differential Privacycited by 3
8 more
  1. 2023Hiding in Plain Sight: Differential Privacy Noise Exploitation for Evasion-resilient Localized Poisoning Attacks in Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
  2. 2025Data Poisoning Attacks to Locally Differentially Private Range Query Protocolscited by 1
  3. 2025Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy Protocols for Trajectory Datacited by 1
  4. 2025Devil's Hand: Data Poisoning Attacks to Locally Private Graph Learning Protocolscited by 1
  5. 2025How to Securely Shuffle? A survey about Secure Shufflers for privacy-preserving computationscited by 1
  6. 2025On Evaluating the Poisoning Robustness of Federated Learning under Local Differential Privacycited by 0
  7. 2026Your Privacy My Cloak: Backdoor Attacks on Differentially Private Federated Learningcited by 0
  8. 2026Robust Estimation of Sparse Numerical Vectors under Local Differential Privacycited by 0