mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

This is the way: designing and compiling LEPISZCZE, a comprehensive NLP benchmark for Polish

arXiv 2211.13112 ↗First posted 23 Nov 2022cs.CL cs.IR cs.LGcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The availability of compute and data to train larger and larger language models increases the demand for robust methods of benchmarking the true progress of LM training. Recent years witnessed significant progress in standardized benchmarking for English. Benchmarks such as GLUE, SuperGLUE, or KILT have become de facto standard tools to compare large language models. Following the trend to replicate GLUE for other languages, the KLEJ benchmark has been released for Polish. In this paper, we evaluate the progress in benchmarking for low-resourced languages. We note that only a handful of languages have such comprehensive benchmarks. We also note the gap in the number of tasks being evaluated by benchmarks for resource-rich English/Chinese and the rest of the world. In this paper, we introduce LEPISZCZE (the Polish word for glew, the Middle English predecessor of glue), a new, comprehensive benchmark for Polish NLP with a large variety of tasks and high-quality operationalization of the benchmark. We design LEPISZCZE with flexibility in mind. Including new models, datasets, and tasks is as simple as possible while still offering data versioning and model tracking. In the first run of the benchmark, we test 13 experiments (task and dataset pairs) based on the five most recent LMs for Polish. We use five datasets from the Polish benchmark and add eight novel datasets. As the paper's main contribution, apart from LEPISZCZE, we provide insights and experiences learned while creating the benchmark for Polish as the blueprint to design similar benchmarks for other low-resourced languages.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2022.

Builds on

43 of 62 references.

References · 43

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  3. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  4. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  5. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
  6. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,790
  7. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  8. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,290
  9. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,729
  10. 2021Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gophercited by 1,202
  11. 2020XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalizationcited by 742
  12. 2020KILT: a Benchmark for Knowledge Intensive Language Taskscited by 573
31 more
  1. 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 459
  2. 2020Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)cited by 322
  3. 2018SentEval: An Evaluation Toolkit for Universal Sentence Representationscited by 294
  4. 2020CLUE: A Chinese Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 278
  5. 2021The GEM Benchmark: Natural Language Generation, its Evaluation and Metricscited by 239
  6. 2018The Natural Language Decathlon: Multitask Learning as Question Answeringcited by 236
  7. 2020XGLUE: A New Benchmark Dataset for Cross-lingual Pre-training, Understanding and Generationcited by 222
  8. 2019Dice Loss for Data-imbalanced NLP Taskscited by 182
  9. 2019FlauBERT: Unsupervised Language Model Pre-training for Frenchcited by 153
  10. 2021KLUE: Korean Language Understanding Evaluationcited by 114
  11. 2020IndoNLU: Benchmark and Resources for Evaluating Indonesian Natural Language Understandingcited by 109
  12. 2021CBLUE: A Chinese Biomedical Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 101
  13. 2020IndoLEM and IndoBERT: A Benchmark Dataset and Pre-trained Language Model for Indonesian NLPcited by 58
  14. 2021IndoNLG: Benchmark and Resources for Evaluating Indonesian Natural Language Generationcited by 57
  15. 2020RussianSuperGLUE: A Russian Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 53
  16. 2020KLEJ: Comprehensive Benchmark for Polish Language Understandingcited by 51
  17. 2021HerBERT: Efficiently Pretrained Transformer-based Language Model for Polishcited by 51
  18. 2021Packed Levitated Marker for Entity and Relation Extractioncited by 49
  19. 2020GLGE: A New General Language Generation Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 47
  20. 2020ParsiNLU: A Suite of Language Understanding Challenges for Persiancited by 42
  21. 2021FewCLUE: A Chinese Few-shot Learning Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 41
  22. 2022KOBEST: Korean Balanced Evaluation of Significant Taskscited by 37
  23. 2020Utility is in the Eye of the User: A Critique of NLP Leaderboardscited by 28
  24. 2022E-KAR: A Benchmark for Rationalizing Natural Language Analogical Reasoningcited by 28
  25. 2021LOT: A Story-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Chinese Long Text Understanding and Generationcited by 24
  26. 2021CUGE: A Chinese Language Understanding and Generation Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 16
  27. 2022A Fine-grained Interpretability Evaluation Benchmark for Neural NLPcited by 15
  28. 2022RuMedBench: A Russian Medical Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 10
  29. 2022Mukayese: Turkish NLP Strikes Backcited by 9
  30. 2022The Document Vectors Using Cosine Similarity Revisitedcited by 5
  31. 2020Political Advertising Dataset: the use case of the Polish 2020 Presidential Electionscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 5; 2025: 4.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: