Acquiescence Bias in Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Acquiescence bias, i.e. the tendency of humans to agree with statements in surveys, independent of their actual beliefs, is well researched and documented. Since Large Language Models (LLMs) have been shown to be very influenceable by relatively small changes in input and are trained on human-generated data, it is reasonable to assume that they could show a similar tendency. We present a study investigating the presence of acquiescence bias in LLMs across different models, tasks, and languages (English, German, and Polish). Our results indicate that, contrary to humans, LLMs display a bias towards answering no, regardless of whether it indicates agreement or disagreement.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2025.
Builds on
11 of 32 references.
References · 11
- 2023LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 336
- 2023Do LLMs exhibit human-like response biases? A case study in survey designcited by 180
- 2024The Effect of Sampling Temperature on Problem Solving in Large Language Modelscited by 170
- 2024Political Compass or Spinning Arrow? Towards More Meaningful Evaluations for Values and Opinions in Large Language Modelscited by 162
- 2024Cognitive Bias in Decision-Making with LLMscited by 106
- 2022Capturing Failures of Large Language Models via Human Cognitive Biasescited by 98
- 2024How Susceptible are LLMs to Influence in Prompts?cited by 33
- 2023Exploring the Sensitivity of LLMs' Decision-Making Capabilities: Insights from Prompt Variation and Hyperparameterscited by 32
- 2022This is the way: designing and compiling LEPISZCZE, a comprehensive NLP benchmark for Polishcited by 13
- 2024AGB-DE: A Corpus for the Automated Legal Assessment of Clauses in German Consumer Contractscited by 4
- 2025Parameterized Argumentation-based Reasoning Tasks for Benchmarking Generative Language Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026AMEL: Accumulated Message Effects on LLM Judgmentscited by 1
- 2026The yes-no bias of large language models reflects answer order and wording, not shifts in moral judgmentcited by 1
- 2026This Is a Good Paper, Right? How Tag Questions Affect Sycophancy Across 106 Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026SPOT: Selective Prompt Projection via Total Variation for Inference-Only Safe Text-to-Image Generationcited by 0
- 2026Distributional Validity of a Korean Synthetic Persona Panel: Evidence From the Korea Media Panel Surveycited by 0
- 2026This Is a Good Paper, Right? How Tag Questions Affect Sycophancy Across 106 Language Models27 Jul 2026
- 2026Distributional Validity of a Korean Synthetic Persona Panel: Evidence From the Korea Media Panel Survey23 Jul 2026
- 2026The yes-no bias of large language models reflects answer order and wording, not shifts in moral judgment6 Jul 2026
- 2026AMEL: Accumulated Message Effects on LLM Judgments21 May 2026
- 2026SPOT: Selective Prompt Projection via Total Variation for Inference-Only Safe Text-to-Image Generation31 Jan 2026