mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Policy Optimization with Advantage Regularization for Long-Term Fairness in Decision Systems

arXiv 2210.12546 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Long-term fairness is an important factor of consideration in designing and deploying learning-based decision systems in high-stake decision-making contexts. Recent work has proposed the use of Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) to formulate decision-making with long-term fairness requirements in dynamically changing environments, and demonstrated major challenges in directly deploying heuristic and rule-based policies that worked well in static environments. We show that policy optimization methods from deep reinforcement learning can be used to find strictly better decision policies that can often achieve both higher overall utility and less violation of the fairness requirements, compared to previously-known strategies. In particular, we propose new methods for imposing fairness requirements in policy optimization by regularizing the advantage evaluation of different actions. Our proposed methods make it easy to impose fairness constraints without reward engineering or sacrificing training efficiency. We perform detailed analyses in three established case studies, including attention allocation in incident monitoring, bank loan approval, and vaccine distribution in population networks.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2022.

Builds on

26 of 35 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  3. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  4. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 983
  5. 2018Reward Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 417
  6. 2015Risk-Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Percentile Risk Criteriacited by 337
  7. 2022The Effects of Reward Misspecification: Mapping and Mitigating Misaligned Modelscited by 328
  8. 2018A Lyapunov-based Approach to Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 297
  9. 2018Safe Exploration in Continuous Action Spacescited by 247
  10. 2018Delayed Impact of Fair Machine Learningcited by 184
  11. 2019Lyapunov-based Safe Policy Optimization for Continuous Controlcited by 145
  12. 2020Neural Lyapunov Controlcited by 142
14 more
  1. 2018The Social Cost of Strategic Classificationcited by 105
  2. 2016Multi-Objective Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 83
  3. 2021Towards Long-term Fairness in Recommendationcited by 77
  4. 2018The Disparate Effects of Strategic Manipulationcited by 75
  5. 2020Learning Fair Policies in Multiobjective (Deep) Reinforcement Learning with Average and Discounted Rewardscited by 60
  6. 2020How Do Fair Decisions Fare in Long-term Qualification?cited by 60
  7. 2019Convergent Policy Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 57
  8. 2019Causal Modeling for Fairness in Dynamical Systemscited by 47
  9. 2021Stabilizing Neural Control Using Self-Learned Almost Lyapunov Criticscited by 35
  10. 2019Value constrained model-free continuous controlcited by 34
  11. 2021A Graph-based Approach for Mitigating Multi-sided Exposure Bias in Recommender Systemscited by 14
  12. 2021Towards Return Parity in Markov Decision Processescited by 13
  13. 2019Fair treatment allocations in social networkscited by 9
  14. 2021Precarity: Modeling the Long Term Effects of Compounded Decisions on Individual Instabilitycited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: