mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adapting Static Fairness to Sequential Decision-Making: Bias Mitigation Strategies towards Equal Long-term Benefit Rate

arXiv 2309.03426 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2023cs.LG cs.CYcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Decisions made by machine learning models can have lasting impacts, making long-term fairness a critical consideration. It has been observed that ignoring the long-term effect and directly applying fairness criterion in static settings can actually worsen bias over time. To address biases in sequential decision-making, we introduce a long-term fairness concept named Equal Long-term Benefit Rate (ELBERT). This concept is seamlessly integrated into a Markov Decision Process (MDP) to consider the future effects of actions on long-term fairness, thus providing a unified framework for fair sequential decision-making problems. ELBERT effectively addresses the temporal discrimination issues found in previous long-term fairness notions. Additionally, we demonstrate that the policy gradient of Long-term Benefit Rate can be analytically simplified to standard policy gradients. This simplification makes conventional policy optimization methods viable for reducing bias, leading to our bias mitigation approach ELBERT-PO. Extensive experiments across various diverse sequential decision-making environments consistently reveal that ELBERT-PO significantly diminishes bias while maintaining high utility. Code is available at https://github.com/umd-huang-lab/ELBERT.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2023.

Builds on

27 of 35 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  3. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
  4. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  5. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  6. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  7. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  8. 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,012
  9. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 667
  10. 2018Delayed Impact of Fair Machine Learningcited by 183
  11. 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 167
  12. 2020Safe Reinforcement Learning in Constrained Markov Decision Processescited by 109
15 more
  1. 2020How Do Fair Decisions Fare in Long-term Qualification?cited by 59
  2. 2019Algorithms for Fairness in Sequential Decision Makingcited by 53
  3. 2019On the Long-term Impact of Algorithmic Decision Policies: Effort Unfairness and Feature Segregation through Social Learningcited by 48
  4. 2019Fair Contextual Multi-Armed Bandits: Theory and Experimentscited by 41
  5. 2021FARF: A Fair and Adaptive Random Forests Classifiercited by 37
  6. 2023Exploring and Exploiting Decision Boundary Dynamics for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 35
  7. 2020Constrained Markov Decision Processes via Backward Value Functionscited by 33
  8. 2018Fair Algorithms for Learning in Allocation Problemscited by 29
  9. 2023Long-Term Fairness with Unknown Dynamicscited by 25
  10. 2021Understanding and Mitigating Accuracy Disparity in Regressioncited by 17
  11. 2022Anchor-Changing Regularized Natural Policy Gradient for Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
  12. 2022Equal Improvability: A New Fairness Notion Considering the Long-term Impactcited by 13
  13. 2022Policy Optimization with Advantage Regularization for Long-Term Fairness in Decision Systemscited by 13
  14. 2021Towards Return Parity in Markov Decision Processescited by 12
  15. 2019Fair treatment allocations in social networkscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

6 papers.