mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Graph-based Approach for Mitigating Multi-sided Exposure Bias in Recommender Systems

arXiv 2107.03415 ↗First posted 7 Jul 2021cs.IR cs.AIcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fairness is a critical system-level objective in recommender systems that has been the subject of extensive recent research. A specific form of fairness is supplier exposure fairness where the objective is to ensure equitable coverage of items across all suppliers in recommendations provided to users. This is especially important in multistakeholder recommendation scenarios where it may be important to optimize utilities not just for the end-user, but also for other stakeholders such as item sellers or producers who desire a fair representation of their items. This type of supplier fairness is sometimes accomplished by attempting to increasing aggregate diversity in order to mitigate popularity bias and to improve the coverage of long-tail items in recommendations. In this paper, we introduce FairMatch, a general graph-based algorithm that works as a post processing approach after recommendation generation to improve exposure fairness for items and suppliers. The algorithm iteratively adds high quality items that have low visibility or items from suppliers with low exposure to the users' final recommendation lists. A comprehensive set of experiments on two datasets and comparison with state-of-the-art baselines show that FairMatch, while significantly improves exposure fairness and aggregate diversity, maintains an acceptable level of relevance of the recommendations.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2021.

Builds on

18 of 51 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,108
  2. 2020Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directionscited by 239
  3. 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 189
  4. 2019Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Searchcited by 137
  5. 2018Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankingscited by 124
  6. 2017How Algorithmic Confounding in Recommendation Systems Increases Homogeneity and Decreases Utilitycited by 116
  7. 2017FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithmcited by 113
  8. 2017Beyond Parity: Fairness Objectives for Collaborative Filteringcited by 93
  9. 2020Feedback Loop and Bias Amplification in Recommender Systemscited by 89
  10. 2019Managing Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems with Personalized Re-rankingcited by 81
  11. 2020FairRec: Two-Sided Fairness for Personalized Recommendations in Two-Sided Platformscited by 77
  12. 2019The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Music Recommendation: A Reproducibility Studycited by 24
6 more
  1. 2020Multi-sided Exposure Bias in Recommendationcited by 23
  2. 2017Deconvolving Feedback Loops in Recommender Systemscited by 17
  3. 2020FairMatch: A Graph-based Approach for Improving Aggregate Diversity in Recommender Systemscited by 15
  4. 2018Fair-by-design matchingcited by 11
  5. 2020Modeling and Counteracting Exposure Bias in Recommender Systemscited by 7
  6. 2020Addressing the Multistakeholder Impact of Popularity Bias in Recommendation Through Calibrationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 6; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: