mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Distributional Reward Estimation for Effective Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2210.07636 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2022cs.LG cs.MAcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-agent reinforcement learning has drawn increasing attention in practice, e.g., robotics and automatic driving, as it can explore optimal policies using samples generated by interacting with the environment. However, high reward uncertainty still remains a problem when we want to train a satisfactory model, because obtaining high-quality reward feedback is usually expensive and even infeasible. To handle this issue, previous methods mainly focus on passive reward correction. At the same time, recent active reward estimation methods have proven to be a recipe for reducing the effect of reward uncertainty. In this paper, we propose a novel Distributional Reward Estimation framework for effective Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (DRE-MARL). Our main idea is to design the multi-action-branch reward estimation and policy-weighted reward aggregation for stabilized training. Specifically, we design the multi-action-branch reward estimation to model reward distributions on all action branches. Then we utilize reward aggregation to obtain stable updating signals during training. Our intuition is that consideration of all possible consequences of actions could be useful for learning policies. The superiority of the DRE-MARL is demonstrated using benchmark multi-agent scenarios, compared with the SOTA baselines in terms of both effectiveness and robustness.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2022.

Builds on

47 of 65 references.

References · 47

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
  4. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
  5. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,558
  6. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,287
  7. 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,103
  8. 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 765
  9. 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 708
  10. 2018Learning Dexterous In-Hand Manipulationcited by 687
  11. 2017Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regressioncited by 474
  12. 2018Actor-Attention-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 261
35 more
  1. 2017Inverse Reward Designcited by 249
  2. 2018Model-Based Value Estimation for Efficient Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 156
  3. 2017Imagination-Augmented Agents for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 140
  4. 2021Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Pointscited by 97
  5. 2016The Predictron: End-To-End Learning and Planningcited by 93
  6. 2020A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 90
  7. 2019Multi-Agent Game Abstraction via Graph Attention Neural Networkcited by 82
  8. 2018Reinforcement Learning with Perturbed Rewardscited by 79
  9. 2017Reinforcement Learning with a Corrupted Reward Channelcited by 70
  10. 2013Classification with Asymmetric Label Noise: Consistency and Maximal Denoisingcited by 68
  11. 2021Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Points When Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 65
  12. 2019Statistics and Samples in Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 63
  13. 2020Federated Bandit: A Gossiping Approachcited by 55
  14. 2021Who Is the Strongest Enemy? Towards Optimal and Efficient Evasion Attacks in Deep RLcited by 55
  15. 2019Multi-Agent Connected Autonomous Driving using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 53
  16. 2014Training Convolutional Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 48
  17. 2020Vulnerability-Aware Poisoning Mechanism for Online RL with Unknown Dynamicscited by 38
  18. 2018Combined Reinforcement Learning via Abstract Representationscited by 37
  19. 2021RMIX: Learning Risk-Sensitive Policies for Cooperative Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 31
  20. 2021DFAC Framework: Factorizing the Value Function via Quantile Mixture for Multi-Agent Distributional Q-Learningcited by 26
  21. 2022Transfer RL across Observation Feature Spaces via Model-Based Regularizationcited by 18
  22. 2018Reward Estimation for Variance Reduction in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
  23. 2020Weakly-Supervised Reinforcement Learning for Controllable Behaviorcited by 17
  24. 2021Outcome-Driven Reinforcement Learning via Variational Inferencecited by 17
  25. 2020Policy Learning Using Weak Supervisioncited by 13
  26. 2019WATTNet: Learning to Trade FX via Hierarchical Spatio-Temporal Representation of Highly Multivariate Time Seriescited by 8
  27. 2017Model-Based Planning with Discrete and Continuous Actionscited by 7
  28. 2020TempLe: Learning Template of Transitions for Sample Efficient Multi-task RLcited by 6
  29. 2018Learning the Reward Function for a Misspecified Modelcited by 4
  30. 2021Disturbing Reinforcement Learning Agents with Corrupted Rewardscited by 4
  31. 2015Learning in the Presence of Corruptioncited by 3
  32. 2021Reward prediction for representation learning and reward shapingcited by 3
  33. 2017Collaborative Inference of Coexisting Information Diffusionscited by 2
  34. 2019Can Agents Learn by Analogy? An Inferable Model for PAC Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
  35. 2021Multimodal Reward Shaping for Efficient Exploration in Reinforcement Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

6 papers.