Disturbing Reinforcement Learning Agents with Corrupted Rewards
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms have led to recent successes in solving complex games, such as Atari or Starcraft, and to a huge impact in real-world applications, such as cybersecurity or autonomous driving. In the side of the drawbacks, recent works have shown how the performance of RL algorithms decreases under the influence of soft changes in the reward function. However, little work has been done about how sensitive these disturbances are depending on the aggressiveness of the attack and the learning exploration strategy. In this paper, we propose to fill this gap in the literature analyzing the effects of different attack strategies based on reward perturbations, and studying the effect in the learner depending on its exploration strategy. In order to explain all the behaviors, we choose a sub-class of MDPs: episodic, stochastic goal-only-rewards MDPs, and in particular, an intelligible grid domain as a benchmark. In this domain, we demonstrate that smoothly crafting adversarial rewards are able to mislead the learner, and that using low exploration probability values, the policy learned is more robust to corrupt rewards. Finally, in the proposed learning scenario, a counterintuitive result arises: attacking at each learning episode is the lowest cost attack strategy.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2021.
Builds on
14 of 20 references.
References · 14
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 847
- 2017Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 439
- 2017Adversarial Attacks on Neural Network Policiescited by 314
- 2017Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Attackscited by 152
- 2017Delving into adversarial attacks on deep policiescited by 104
- 2017Vulnerability of Deep Reinforcement Learning to Policy Induction Attackscited by 91
- 2018Reinforcement Learning with Perturbed Rewardscited by 76
- 2019Policy Poisoning in Batch Reinforcement Learning and Controlcited by 70
- 2017Reinforcement Learning under Model Mismatchcited by 52
- 2019Data Poisoning Attacks on Stochastic Banditscited by 52
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Reinforcement Learning for Feedback-Enabled Cyber Resiliencecited by 18
- 2022Distributional Reward Estimation for Effective Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
- 2022Security of Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 1
- 2024Provably Efficient Action-Manipulation Attack Against Continuous Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2024Provably Efficient Action-Manipulation Attack Against Continuous Reinforcement Learning20 Nov 2024
- 2022Security of Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Survey12 Dec 2022
- 2022Distributional Reward Estimation for Effective Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning14 Oct 2022
- 2021Reinforcement Learning for Feedback-Enabled Cyber Resilience2 Jul 2021