mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Gender Stereotyping Impact in Facial Expression Recognition

arXiv 2210.05332 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2022cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Facial Expression Recognition (FER) uses images of faces to identify the emotional state of users, allowing for a closer interaction between humans and autonomous systems. Unfortunately, as the images naturally integrate some demographic information, such as apparent age, gender, and race of the subject, these systems are prone to demographic bias issues. In recent years, machine learning-based models have become the most popular approach to FER. These models require training on large datasets of facial expression images, and their generalization capabilities are strongly related to the characteristics of the dataset. In publicly available FER datasets, apparent gender representation is usually mostly balanced, but their representation in the individual label is not, embedding social stereotypes into the datasets and generating a potential for harm. Although this type of bias has been overlooked so far, it is important to understand the impact it may have in the context of FER. To do so, we use a popular FER dataset, FER+, to generate derivative datasets with different amounts of stereotypical bias by altering the gender proportions of certain labels. We then proceed to measure the discrepancy between the performance of the models trained on these datasets for the apparent gender groups. We observe a discrepancy in the recognition of certain emotions between genders of up to 29 % under the worst bias conditions. Our results also suggest a safety range for stereotypical bias in a dataset that does not appear to produce stereotypical bias in the resulting model. Our findings support the need for a thorough bias analysis of public datasets in problems like FER, where a global balance of demographic representation can still hide other types of bias that harm certain demographic groups.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2022.

Builds on

16 of 33 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  2. 2017Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraintscited by 420
  3. 2021Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypescited by 326
  4. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  5. 2013Challenges in Representation Learning: A report on three machine learning contestscited by 301
  6. 2018Deep Facial Expression Recognition: A Surveycited by 269
  7. 2020Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision?cited by 237
  8. 2018A disciplined approach to neural network hyper-parameters: Part 1 -- learning rate, batch size, momentum, and weight decaycited by 223
  9. 2019A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cyclecited by 192
  10. 2016Training Deep Networks for Facial Expression Recognition with Crowd-Sourced Label Distributioncited by 158
  11. 2020Investigating Bias and Fairness in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 87
  12. 2019Fairness in representation: quantifying stereotyping as a representational harmcited by 26
4 more
  1. 2021Responsible AI: Gender bias assessment in emotion recognitioncited by 22
  2. 2020Uncovering the Bias in Facial Expressionscited by 12
  3. 2020Bias in Data-driven AI Systems -- An Introductory Surveycited by 10
  4. 2022Assessing Demographic Bias Transfer from Dataset to Model: A Case Study in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 4.

8 papers.