mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Toward Fair Facial Expression Recognition with Improved Distribution Alignment

arXiv 2306.06696 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2023cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a novel approach to mitigate bias in facial expression recognition (FER) models. Our method aims to reduce sensitive attribute information such as gender, age, or race, in the embeddings produced by FER models. We employ a kernel mean shrinkage estimator to estimate the kernel mean of the distributions of the embeddings associated with different sensitive attribute groups, such as young and old, in the Hilbert space. Using this estimation, we calculate the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) distance between the distributions and incorporate it in the classifier loss along with an adversarial loss, which is then minimized through the learning process to improve the distribution alignment. Our method makes sensitive attributes less recognizable for the model, which in turn promotes fairness. Additionally, for the first time, we analyze the notion of attractiveness as an important sensitive attribute in FER models and demonstrate that FER models can indeed exhibit biases towards more attractive faces. To prove the efficacy of our model in reducing bias regarding different sensitive attributes (including the newly proposed attractiveness attribute), we perform several experiments on two widely used datasets, CelebA and RAF-DB. The results in terms of both accuracy and fairness measures outperform the state-of-the-art in most cases, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2023.

Builds on

25 of 43 references.

References · 25

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
  4. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  5. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  6. 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,105
  7. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  8. 2018Progress & Compress: A scalable framework for continual learningcited by 520
  9. 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
  10. 2018Re-evaluating Continual Learning Scenarios: A Categorization and Case for Strong Baselinescited by 228
  11. 2015The Variational Fair Autoencodercited by 223
  12. 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
13 more
  1. 2018Turning a Blind Eye: Explicit Removal of Biases and Variation from Deep Neural Network Embeddingscited by 114
  2. 2020Investigating Bias and Fairness in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 87
  3. 2018Bias Mitigation Post-processing for Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 72
  4. 2021Understanding and Mitigating Annotation Bias in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 50
  5. 2018Exploring Disentangled Feature Representation Beyond Face Identificationcited by 36
  6. 2021Domain-Incremental Continual Learning for Mitigating Bias in Facial Expression and Action Unit Recognitioncited by 19
  7. 2014Kernel Mean Shrinkage Estimatorscited by 16
  8. 2019Bias Remediation in Driver Drowsiness Detection systems using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 14
  9. 2022The Effect of Model Compression on Fairness in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 13
  10. 2022Gender Stereotyping Impact in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 8
  11. 2021Face Trees for Expression Recognitioncited by 6
  12. 2022Analysis of Semi-Supervised Methods for Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 4
  13. 2022FaceTopoNet: Facial Expression Recognition using Face Topology Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.