mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Biased Heritage: How Datasets Shape Models in Facial Expression Recognition

arXiv 2503.03446 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2025cs.CV cs.CYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) systems has raised concerns about our ability to ensure their fairness, that is, how to avoid discrimination based on protected characteristics such as gender, race, or age. While algorithmic fairness is well-studied in simple binary classification tasks on tabular data, its application to complex, real-world scenarios-such as Facial Expression Recognition (FER)-remains underexplored. FER presents unique challenges: it is inherently multiclass, and biases emerge across intersecting demographic variables, each potentially comprising multiple protected groups. We present a comprehensive framework to analyze bias propagation from datasets to trained models in image-based FER systems, while introducing new bias metrics specifically designed for multiclass problems with multiple demographic groups. Our methodology studies bias propagation by (1) inducing controlled biases in FER datasets, (2) training models on these biased datasets, and (3) analyzing the correlation between dataset bias metrics and model fairness notions. Our findings reveal that stereotypical biases propagate more strongly to model predictions than representational biases, suggesting that preventing emotion-specific demographic patterns should be prioritized over general demographic balance in FER datasets. Additionally, we observe that biased datasets lead to reduced model accuracy, challenging the assumed fairness-accuracy trade-off.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2025.

Builds on

31 of 77 references.

References · 31

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  4. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  5. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
  6. 2017AffectNet: A Database for Facial Expression, Valence, and Arousal Computing in the Wildcited by 492
  7. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 384
  8. 2013Challenges in Representation Learning: A report on three machine learning contestscited by 302
  9. 2018A disciplined approach to neural network hyper-parameters: Part 1 -- learning rate, batch size, momentum, and weight decaycited by 226
  10. 2019A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cyclecited by 193
  11. 2021Affect Analysis in-the-wild: Valence-Arousal, Expressions, Action Units and a Unified Frameworkcited by 174
  12. 2022Bias Mitigation for Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 125
19 more
  1. 2018The Measure and Mismeasure of Fairnesscited by 95
  2. 2020Investigating Bias and Fairness in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 87
  3. 2021A Survey on Bias in Visual Datasetscited by 84
  4. 2016From Facial Expression Recognition to Interpersonal Relation Predictioncited by 53
  5. 2021Emergent Unfairness in Algorithmic Fairness-Accuracy Trade-Off Researchcited by 34
  6. 2021Responsible AI: Gender bias assessment in emotion recognitioncited by 22
  7. 2022Potential sources of dataset bias complicate investigation of underdiagnosis by machine learning algorithmscited by 19
  8. 2015Max-Margin Object Detectioncited by 15
  9. 2024FairAIED: Navigating Fairness, Bias, and Ethics in Educational AI Applicationscited by 15
  10. 2022Blackbox Post-Processing for Multiclass Fairnesscited by 14
  11. 2023Metrics for Dataset Demographic Bias: A Case Study on Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 13
  12. 2017The impossibility of "fairness": a generalized impossibility result for decisionscited by 12
  13. 2020Uncovering the Bias in Facial Expressionscited by 12
  14. 2022Assessing Demographic Bias Transfer from Dataset to Model: A Case Study in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 9
  15. 2022Gender Stereotyping Impact in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 8
  16. 2022Subverting Fair Image Search with Generative Adversarial Perturbationscited by 5
  17. 2023DSAP: Analyzing Bias Through Demographic Comparison of Datasetscited by 5
  18. 2024Less can be more: representational vs. stereotypical gender bias in facial expression recognitioncited by 5
  19. 2021Domain Generalisation for Apparent Emotional Facial Expression Recognition across Age-Groupscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.