Bias in Data-driven AI Systems -- An Introductory Survey
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI-based systems are widely employed nowadays to make decisions that have far-reaching impacts on individuals and society. Their decisions might affect everyone, everywhere and anytime, entailing concerns about potential human rights issues. Therefore, it is necessary to move beyond traditional AI algorithms optimized for predictive performance and embed ethical and legal principles in their design, training and deployment to ensure social good while still benefiting from the huge potential of the AI technology. The goal of this survey is to provide a broad multi-disciplinary overview of the area of bias in AI systems, focusing on technical challenges and solutions as well as to suggest new research directions towards approaches well-grounded in a legal frame. In this survey, we focus on data-driven AI, as a large part of AI is powered nowadays by (big) data and powerful Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. If otherwise not specified, we use the general term bias to describe problems related to the gathering or processing of data that might result in prejudiced decisions on the bases of demographic features like race, sex, etc.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
10 papers.
- 2021Diachronic Analysis of German Parliamentary Proceedings: Ideological Shifts through the Lens of Political Biasescited by 13
- 2022Privacy Meets Explainability: A Comprehensive Impact Benchmarkcited by 9
- 2022Gender Stereotyping Impact in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 8
- 2023Rating Sentiment Analysis Systems for Bias through a Causal Lenscited by 6
- 2023Advances in Automatically Rating the Trustworthiness of Text Processing Servicescited by 6
- 2025ALBAR: Adversarial Learning approach to mitigate Biases in Action Recognitioncited by 5
- 2021Seven challenges for harmonizing explainability requirementscited by 4
- 2024The Effect of Human v/s Synthetic Test Data and Round-tripping on Assessment of Sentiment Analysis Systems for Biascited by 4
- 2025Mitigation of Gender and Ethnicity Bias in AI-Generated Stories through Model Explanationscited by 1
- 2021Technology Readiness Levels for Machine Learning Systemscited by 0
- 2025Mitigation of Gender and Ethnicity Bias in AI-Generated Stories through Model Explanations3 Sep 2025
- 2025ALBAR: Adversarial Learning approach to mitigate Biases in Action Recognition31 Jan 2025
- 2024The Effect of Human v/s Synthetic Test Data and Round-tripping on Assessment of Sentiment Analysis Systems for Bias15 Jan 2024
- 2023Advances in Automatically Rating the Trustworthiness of Text Processing Services4 Feb 2023
- 2023Rating Sentiment Analysis Systems for Bias through a Causal Lens4 Feb 2023
- 2022Privacy Meets Explainability: A Comprehensive Impact Benchmark8 Nov 2022
- 2022Gender Stereotyping Impact in Facial Expression Recognition11 Oct 2022
- 2021Diachronic Analysis of German Parliamentary Proceedings: Ideological Shifts through the Lens of Political Biases13 Aug 2021
- 2021Seven challenges for harmonizing explainability requirements11 Aug 2021
- 2021Technology Readiness Levels for Machine Learning Systems11 Jan 2021