Uncovering the Bias in Facial Expressions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Over the past decades the machine and deep learning community has celebrated great achievements in challenging tasks such as image classification. The deep architecture of artificial neural networks together with the plenitude of available data makes it possible to describe highly complex relations. Yet, it is still impossible to fully capture what the deep learning model has learned and to verify that it operates fairly and without creating bias, especially in critical tasks, for instance those arising in the medical field. One example for such a task is the detection of distinct facial expressions, called Action Units, in facial images. Considering this specific task, our research aims to provide transparency regarding bias, specifically in relation to gender and skin color. We train a neural network for Action Unit classification and analyze its performance quantitatively based on its accuracy and qualitatively based on heatmaps. A structured review of our results indicates that we are able to detect bias. Even though we cannot conclude from our results that lower classification performance emerged solely from gender and skin color bias, these biases must be addressed, which is why we end by giving suggestions on how the detected bias can be avoided.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 2.
12 papers.
- 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameterscited by 693
- 2023PaLI-X: On Scaling up a Multilingual Vision and Language Modelcited by 255
- 2024CLIP the Bias: How Useful is Balancing Data in Multimodal Learning?cited by 35
- 2021Anatomizing Bias in Facial Analysiscited by 18
- 2023Metrics for Dataset Demographic Bias: A Case Study on Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 12
- 2022A Reduction to Binary Approach for Debiasing Multiclass Datasetscited by 9
- 2022Gender Stereotyping Impact in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 8
- 2025Faces of Fairness: Examining Bias in Facial Expression Recognition Datasets and Modelscited by 6
- 2024Less can be more: representational vs. stereotypical gender bias in facial expression recognitioncited by 5
- 2024FaceX: Understanding Face Attribute Classifiers through Summary Model Explanationscited by 2
- 2024From Bias to Balance: Detecting Facial Expression Recognition Biases in Large Multimodal Foundation Modelscited by 1
- 2025Biased Heritage: How Datasets Shape Models in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 1
- 2025Biased Heritage: How Datasets Shape Models in Facial Expression Recognition5 Mar 2025
- 2025Faces of Fairness: Examining Bias in Facial Expression Recognition Datasets and Models16 Feb 2025
- 2024FaceX: Understanding Face Attribute Classifiers through Summary Model Explanations10 Dec 2024
- 2024From Bias to Balance: Detecting Facial Expression Recognition Biases in Large Multimodal Foundation Models27 Aug 2024
- 2024Less can be more: representational vs. stereotypical gender bias in facial expression recognition25 Jun 2024
- 2024CLIP the Bias: How Useful is Balancing Data in Multimodal Learning?7 Mar 2024
- 2023PaLI-X: On Scaling up a Multilingual Vision and Language Model29 May 2023
- 2023Metrics for Dataset Demographic Bias: A Case Study on Facial Expression Recognition28 Mar 2023
- 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameters10 Feb 2023
- 2022Gender Stereotyping Impact in Facial Expression Recognition11 Oct 2022
- 2022A Reduction to Binary Approach for Debiasing Multiclass Datasets31 May 2022
- 2021Anatomizing Bias in Facial Analysis13 Dec 2021