A Feature-level Bias Evaluation Framework for Facial Expression Recognition Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent studies on fairness have shown that Facial Expression Recognition (FER) models exhibit biases toward certain visually perceived demographic groups. However, the limited availability of human-annotated demographic labels in public FER datasets has constrained the scope of such bias analysis. To overcome this limitation, some prior works have resorted to pseudo-demographic labels, which may distort bias evaluation results. Alternatively, in this paper, we propose a feature-level bias evaluation framework for evaluating demographic biases in FER models under the setting where demographic labels are unavailable in the test set. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method more effectively evaluates demographic biases compared to existing approaches that rely on pseudo-demographic labels. Furthermore, we observe that many existing studies do not include statistical testing in their bias evaluations, raising concerns that some reported biases may not be statistically significant but rather due to randomness. To address this issue, we introduce a plug-and-play statistical module to ensure the statistical significance of biased evaluation results. A comprehensive bias analysis based on the proposed module is then conducted across three sensitive attributes (age, gender, and race), seven facial expressions, and multiple network architectures on a large-scale dataset, revealing the prominent demographic biases in FER and providing insights on selecting a fairer network architecture.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2025.
Builds on
38 of 78 references.
References · 38
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
- 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2017AffectNet: A Database for Facial Expression, Valence, and Arousal Computing in the Wildcited by 492
- 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 429
- 2020No Subclass Left Behind: Fine-Grained Robustness in Coarse-Grained Classification Problemscited by 209
- 2019Towards Fairer Datasets: Filtering and Balancing the Distribution of the People Subtree in the ImageNet Hierarchycited by 156
- 2022Domino: Discovering Systematic Errors with Cross-Modal Embeddingscited by 156
26 more
- 2019Mitigate Bias in Face Recognition using Skewness-Aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 145
- 2020Fair Attribute Classification through Latent Space De-biasingcited by 125
- 2020Image Representations Learned With Unsupervised Pre-Training Contain Human-like Biasescited by 107
- 2020Investigating Bias and Fairness in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 87
- 2022Learning Multi-dimensional Edge Feature-based AU Relation Graph for Facial Action Unit Recognitioncited by 82
- 2022Fair Contrastive Learning for Facial Attribute Classificationcited by 71
- 2020Mitigating Face Recognition Bias via Group Adaptive Classifiercited by 67
- 2021Directional Bias Amplificationcited by 54
- 2021Understanding and Mitigating Annotation Bias in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 50
- 2022Contrastive Language-Vision AI Models Pretrained on Web-Scraped Multimodal Data Exhibit Sexual Objectification Biascited by 43
- 2021Consistent Instance False Positive Improves Fairness in Face Recognitioncited by 40
- 2022American == White in Multimodal Language-and-Image AIcited by 39
- 2023Overwriting Pretrained Bias with Finetuning Datacited by 32
- 2022FairGRAPE: Fairness-aware GRAdient Pruning mEthod for Face Attribute Classificationcited by 30
- 2021Responsible AI: Gender bias assessment in emotion recognitioncited by 22
- 2021Domain-Incremental Continual Learning for Mitigating Bias in Facial Expression and Action Unit Recognitioncited by 19
- 2021Anatomizing Bias in Facial Analysiscited by 18
- 2022A study on the distribution of social biases in self-supervised learning visual modelscited by 13
- 2023Metrics for Dataset Demographic Bias: A Case Study on Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 13
- 2022Gender Stereotyping Impact in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 8
- 2023A Multidimensional Analysis of Social Biases in Vision Transformerscited by 8
- 2024Rethinking Affect Analysis: A Protocol for Ensuring Fairness and Consistencycited by 7
- 2024Less can be more: representational vs. stereotypical gender bias in facial expression recognitioncited by 5
- 2023Using Positive Matching Contrastive Loss with Facial Action Units to mitigate bias in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 4
- 2023Biased Attention: Do Vision Transformers Amplify Gender Bias More than Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 4
- 2023Toward Fair Facial Expression Recognition with Improved Distribution Alignmentcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.