mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Assessing Demographic Bias Transfer from Dataset to Model: A Case Study in Facial Expression Recognition

arXiv 2205.10049 ↗First posted 20 May 2022cs.CV cs.CYcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The increasing amount of applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has led researchers to study the social impact of these technologies and evaluate their fairness. Unfortunately, current fairness metrics are hard to apply in multi-class multi-demographic classification problems, such as Facial Expression Recognition (FER). We propose a new set of metrics to approach these problems. Of the three metrics proposed, two focus on the representational and stereotypical bias of the dataset, and the third one on the residual bias of the trained model. These metrics combined can potentially be used to study and compare diverse bias mitigation methods. We demonstrate the usefulness of the metrics by applying them to a FER problem based on the popular Affectnet dataset. Like many other datasets for FER, Affectnet is a large Internet-sourced dataset with 291,651 labeled images. Obtaining images from the Internet raises some concerns over the fairness of any system trained on this data and its ability to generalize properly to diverse populations. We first analyze the dataset and some variants, finding substantial racial bias and gender stereotypes. We then extract several subsets with different demographic properties and train a model on each one, observing the amount of residual bias in the different setups. We also provide a second analysis on a different dataset, FER+.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2022.

Builds on

11 of 31 references.

References · 11

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  2. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  3. 2017AffectNet: A Database for Facial Expression, Valence, and Arousal Computing in the Wildcited by 490
  4. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  5. 2013Challenges in Representation Learning: A report on three machine learning contestscited by 301
  6. 2020Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision?cited by 237
  7. 2018A disciplined approach to neural network hyper-parameters: Part 1 -- learning rate, batch size, momentum, and weight decaycited by 223
  8. 2019A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cyclecited by 192
  9. 2016Training Deep Networks for Facial Expression Recognition with Crowd-Sourced Label Distributioncited by 158
  10. 2020Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 143
  11. 2019Auditing ImageNet: Towards a Model-driven Framework for Annotating Demographic Attributes of Large-Scale Image Datasetscited by 24

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.

9 papers.