mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Curved Geometric Networks for Visual Anomaly Recognition

arXiv 2208.01188 ↗First posted 2 Aug 2022cs.CVcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning a latent embedding to understand the underlying nature of data distribution is often formulated in Euclidean spaces with zero curvature. However, the success of the geometry constraints, posed in the embedding space, indicates that curved spaces might encode more structural information, leading to better discriminative power and hence richer representations. In this work, we investigate benefits of the curved space for analyzing anomalies or out-of-distribution objects in data. This is achieved by considering embeddings via three geometry constraints, namely, spherical geometry (with positive curvature), hyperbolic geometry (with negative curvature) or mixed geometry (with both positive and negative curvatures). Three geometric constraints can be chosen interchangeably in a unified design given the task at hand. Tailored for the embeddings in the curved space, we also formulate functions to compute the anomaly score. Two types of geometric modules (i.e., Geometric-in-One and Geometric-in-Two models) are proposed to plug in the original Euclidean classifier, and anomaly scores are computed from the curved embeddings. We evaluate the resulting designs under a diverse set of visual recognition scenarios, including image detection (multi-class OOD detection and one-class anomaly detection) and segmentation (multi-class anomaly segmentation and one-class anomaly segmentation). The empirical results show the effectiveness of our proposal through the consistent improvement over various scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 60 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2022.

Builds on

60 of 83 references.

References · 60

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
  2. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,707
  3. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,430
  4. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,063
  5. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,011
  6. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,371
  7. 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,590
  8. 2017Deep Setscited by 1,404
  9. 2015LSUN: Construction of a Large-scale Image Dataset using Deep Learning with Humans in the Loopcited by 1,350
  10. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,327
  11. 2016Geometric deep learning: going beyond Euclidean datacited by 1,045
  12. 2017SphereFace: Deep Hypersphere Embedding for Face Recognitioncited by 735
38 more
  1. 2017Poincar'e Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representationscited by 678
  2. 2017Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Generative Adversarial Networks to Guide Marker Discoverycited by 566
  3. 2019Memorizing Normality to Detect Anomaly: Memory-augmented Deep Autoencoder for Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 562
  4. 2021CutPaste: Self-Supervised Learning for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 530
  5. 2019Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 513
  6. 2019Scaling Out-of-Distribution Detection for Real-World Settingscited by 465
  7. 2019Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 451
  8. 2020CSI: Novelty Detection via Contrastive Learning on Distributionally Shifted Instancescited by 441
  9. 2020Generalized ODIN: Detecting Out-of-distribution Image without Learning from Out-of-distribution Datacited by 408
  10. 2017Training Confidence-calibrated Classifiers for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samplescited by 389
  11. 2019Uninformed Students: Student-Teacher Anomaly Detection with Discriminative Latent Embeddingscited by 386
  12. 2020Multiresolution Knowledge Distillation for Anomaly Detectioncited by 285
  13. 2018Deep Anomaly Detection Using Geometric Transformationscited by 269
  14. 2022A Unified Model for Multi-class Anomaly Detectioncited by 268
  15. 2018Improving Unsupervised Defect Segmentation by Applying Structural Similarity to Autoencoderscited by 264
  16. 2018Learning Confidence for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Neural Networkscited by 245
  17. 2019Hyperbolic Image Embeddingscited by 219
  18. 2020Patch SVDD: Patch-level SVDD for Anomaly Detection and Segmentationcited by 212
  19. 2020Classification-Based Anomaly Detection for General Datacited by 210
  20. 2019OCGAN: One-class Novelty Detection Using GANs with Constrained Latent Representationscited by 199
  21. 2019Addressing Failure Prediction by Learning Model Confidencecited by 185
  22. 2021Anomaly Detection on Attributed Networks via Contrastive Self-Supervised Learningcited by 176
  23. 2020PANDA: Adapting Pretrained Features for Anomaly Detection and Segmentationcited by 175
  24. 2015TurkerGaze: Crowdsourcing Saliency with Webcam based Eye Trackingcited by 165
  25. 2018Poincar'e GloVe: Hyperbolic Word Embeddingscited by 155
  26. 2018Latent Space Autoregression for Novelty Detectioncited by 149
  27. 2018Deep Autoencoding Models for Unsupervised Anomaly Segmentation in Brain MR Imagescited by 146
  28. 2019Detecting the Unexpected via Image Resynthesiscited by 137
  29. 2021OpenGAN: Open-Set Recognition via Open Data Generationcited by 135
  30. 2018Out-of-Distribution Detection Using an Ensemble of Self Supervised Leave-out Classifierscited by 126
  31. 2019Towards Visually Explaining Variational Autoencoderscited by 113
  32. 2019Unsupervised Out-of-Distribution Detection by Maximum Classifier Discrepancycited by 112
  33. 2020Synthesize then Compare: Detecting Failures and Anomalies for Semantic Segmentationcited by 96
  34. 2019Mixed-curvature Variational Autoencoderscited by 86
  35. 2018Embedding Text in Hyperbolic Spacescited by 76
  36. 2017Deep Hyperspherical Learningcited by 55
  37. 2020Iterative energy-based projection on a normal data manifold for anomaly localizationcited by 47
  38. 2021HoroPCA: Hyperbolic Dimensionality Reduction via Horospherical Projectionscited by 47

50 most cited of 60 All 60 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 8; 2026: 3.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: