Counting Like Human: Anthropoid Crowd Counting on Modeling the Similarity of Objects
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The mainstream crowd counting methods regress density map and integrate it to obtain counting results. Since the density representation to one head accords to its adjacent distribution, it embeds the same category objects with variant values, while human beings counting models the invariant features namely similarity to objects. Inspired by this, we propose a rational and anthropoid crowd counting framework. To begin with, we leverage counting scalar as supervision signal, which provides global and implicit guidance to similar matters. Then, the large kernel CNN is utilized to imitate the paradigm of human beings which models invariant knowledge firstly and slides to compare similarity. Later, re-parameterization on pre-trained paralleled parameters is presented to cater to the inner-class variance on similarity comparison. Finally, the Random Scaling patches Yield (RSY) is proposed to facilitate similarity modeling on long distance dependencies. Extensive experiments on five challenging benchmarks in crowd counting show the proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2022.
Builds on
33 of 37 references.
References · 33
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
- 2017Understanding the Effective Receptive Field in Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 549
- 2021RepVGG: Making VGG-style ConvNets Great Againcited by 520
- 2018Few-shot Object Detection via Feature Reweightingcited by 265
- 2019Few-Shot Object Detection with Attention-RPN and Multi-Relation Detectorcited by 206
- 2018Composition Loss for Counting, Density Map Estimation and Localization in Dense Crowdscited by 186
- 2019Bayesian Loss for Crowd Count Estimation with Point Supervisioncited by 162
- 2022Scaling Up Your Kernels to 31x31: Revisiting Large Kernel Design in CNNscited by 155
- 2020NWPU-Crowd: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Crowd Counting and Localizationcited by 151
21 more
- 2021Learning To Count Everythingcited by 149
- 2020Distribution Matching for Crowd Countingcited by 143
- 2018Class-Agnostic Countingcited by 85
- 2022Boosting Crowd Counting via Multifaceted Attentioncited by 73
- 2016Finding Tiny Facescited by 72
- 2020Localization in the Crowd with Topological Constraintscited by 68
- 2021TransCrowd: weakly-supervised crowd counting with transformerscited by 61
- 2022Rethinking Spatial Invariance of Convolutional Networks for Object Countingcited by 54
- 2019AutoScale: Learning to Scale for Crowd Counting and Localizationcited by 35
- 2019PCC Net: Perspective Crowd Counting via Spatial Convolutional Networkcited by 33
- 2020Towards Using Count-level Weak Supervision for Crowd Countingcited by 33
- 2019Pushing the Frontiers of Unconstrained Crowd Counting: New Dataset and Benchmark Methodcited by 32
- 2020Learning Independent Instance Maps for Crowd Localizationcited by 24
- 2020Hybrid Graph Neural Networks for Crowd Countingcited by 21
- 2022Discrete-Constrained Regression for Local Counting Modelscited by 19
- 2019C^3 Framework: An Open-source PyTorch Code for Crowd Countingcited by 18
- 2022Crowd Localization from Gaussian Mixture Scoped Knowledge and Scoped Teachercited by 12
- 2020Counting People by Estimating People Flowscited by 11
- 2022CrowdFormer: Weakly-supervised Crowd counting with Improved Generalizabilitycited by 8
- 2022CrowdMLP: Weakly-Supervised Crowd Counting via Multi-Granularity MLPcited by 8
- 2022Reinforcing Local Feature Representation for Weakly-Supervised Dense Crowd Countingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.