mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Unified Learning from Demonstrations, Corrections, and Preferences during Physical Human-Robot Interaction

arXiv 2207.03395 ↗First posted 7 Jul 2022cs.ROcited by 18

On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Robot learning from demonstration

Abstract (arXiv)

Humans can leverage physical interaction to teach robot arms. This physical interaction takes multiple forms depending on the task, the user, and what the robot has learned so far. State-of-the-art approaches focus on learning from a single modality, or combine multiple interaction types by assuming that the robot has prior information about the human's intended task. By contrast, in this paper we introduce an algorithmic formalism that unites learning from demonstrations, corrections, and preferences. Our approach makes no assumptions about the tasks the human wants to teach the robot; instead, we learn a reward model from scratch by comparing the human's inputs to nearby alternatives. We first derive a loss function that trains an ensemble of reward models to match the human's demonstrations, corrections, and preferences. The type and order of feedback is up to the human teacher: we enable the robot to collect this feedback passively or actively. We then apply constrained optimization to convert our learned reward into a desired robot trajectory. Through simulations and a user study we demonstrate that our proposed approach more accurately learns manipulation tasks from physical human interaction than existing baselines, particularly when the robot is faced with new or unexpected objectives. Videos of our user study are available at: https://youtu.be/FSUJsTYvEKU

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Robot learning from demonstration, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. Builds on 22 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2022.

Builds on

22 of 56 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2020Learning from Suboptimal Demonstration via Self-Supervised Reward Regression17 Oct

Other references · 21

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  3. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  4. 2017Learning Robust Rewards with Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 485
  5. 2018An Algorithmic Perspective on Imitation Learningcited by 455
  6. 2018Reward learning from human preferences and demonstrations in Ataricited by 314
  7. 2021PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-trainingcited by 298
  8. 2019Extrapolating Beyond Suboptimal Demonstrations via Inverse Reinforcement Learning from Observationscited by 256
  9. 2018HG-DAgger: Interactive Imitation Learning with Human Expertscited by 245
  10. 2020Reward-rational (implicit) choice: A unifying formalism for reward learningcited by 119
  11. 2021ThriftyDAgger: Budget-Aware Novelty and Risk Gating for Interactive Imitation Learningcited by 98
  12. 2020Learning Reward Functions from Diverse Sources of Human Feedback: Optimally Integrating Demonstrations and Preferencescited by 71
9 more
  1. 2021Confidence-Aware Imitation Learning from Demonstrations with Varying Optimalitycited by 44
  2. 2016Learning Preferences for Manipulation Tasks from Online Coactive Feedbackcited by 31
  3. 2021Learning Human Objectives from Sequences of Physical Correctionscited by 21
  4. 2020Quantifying Hypothesis Space Misspecification in Learning from Human-Robot Demonstrations and Physical Correctionscited by 19
  5. 2021Physical Interaction as Communication: Learning Robot Objectives Online from Human Correctionscited by 19
  6. 2022Inducing Structure in Reward Learning by Learning Featurescited by 16
  7. 2020Four Years in Review: Statistical Practices of Likert Scales in Human-Robot Interaction Studiescited by 12
  8. 2021Corrective Shared Autonomy for Addressing Task Variabilitycited by 5
  9. 2017Trajectory Deformations from Physical Human-Robot Interactioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 6; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Learning Reward for Robot Skills Using Large Language Models via Self-Alignmentcited by 19
  2. 2023RLHF-Blender: A Configurable Interactive Interface for Learning from Diverse Human Feedbackcited by 15
  3. 2024SAFE-GIL: SAFEty Guided Imitation Learning for Robotic Systemscited by 13
  4. 2024VIEW: Visual Imitation Learning with Waypointscited by 10
  5. 2025Reward Learning from Multiple Feedback Typescited by 9
  6. 2022Time-Efficient Reward Learning via Visually Assisted Cluster Rankingcited by 8
  7. 2023OpenVR: Teleoperation for Manipulationcited by 8
  8. 2024Leveraging Sub-Optimal Data for Human-in-the-Loop Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
  9. 2023Learning Reward for Physical Skills using Large Language Modelcited by 5
  10. 2024Mapping out the Space of Human Feedback for Reinforcement Learning: A Conceptual Frameworkcited by 5
  11. 2025Optimal Interactive Learning on the Job via Facility Location Planningcited by 2
  12. 2025Learning from Preferences and Mixed Demonstrations in General Settingscited by 1
6 more
  1. 2023Can Differentiable Decision Trees Enable Interpretable Reward Learning from Human Feedback?cited by 0
  2. 2024AI-Guided Molecular Simulations in VR: Exploring Strategies for Imitation Learning in Hyperdimensional Molecular Systemscited by 0
  3. 2025QuickLAP: Quick Language-Action Preference Learning for Semi-Autonomous Agentscited by 0
  4. 2026MAVRL: Learning Reward Functions from Multiple Feedback Types with Amortized Variational Inferencecited by 0
  5. 2026Multi-Modal, Multi-Environment Machine Teaching for Robust Reward Learningcited by 0
  6. 2026PHIRL: Aligning Learned Rewards with Task Progress for Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025When a Robot is More Capable than a Human: Learning from Constrained Demonstrators
  2. 2023Learning a Universal Human Prior for Dexterous Manipulation from Human Preference
  3. 2022Learning from Physical Human Feedback: An Object-Centric One-Shot Adaptation Method
  4. 2026Freeform Preference Learning for Robotic Manipulation
  5. 2021Skill Preferences: Learning to Extract and Execute Robotic Skills from Human Feedback
  6. 2022Learning Preferences for Interactive Autonomy
  7. 2026One-Shot Learning from Demonstration of Contact-Rich Robotic Manipulation by Identifying Physical Interactions
  8. 2021Learning Online from Corrective Feedback: A Meta-Algorithm for Robotics