Four Years in Review: Statistical Practices of Likert Scales in Human-Robot Interaction Studies
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As robots become more prevalent, the importance of the field of human-robot interaction (HRI) grows accordingly. As such, we should endeavor to employ the best statistical practices. Likert scales are commonly used metrics in HRI to measure perceptions and attitudes. Due to misinformation or honest mistakes, most HRI researchers do not adopt best practices when analyzing Likert data. We conduct a review of psychometric literature to determine the current standard for Likert scale design and analysis. Next, we conduct a survey of four years of the International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (2016 through 2019) and report on incorrect statistical practices and design of Likert scales. During these years, only 3 of the 110 papers applied proper statistical testing to correctly-designed Likert scales. Our analysis suggests there are areas for meaningful improvement in the design and testing of Likert scales. Lastly, we provide recommendations to improve the accuracy of conclusions drawn from Likert data.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Jan 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.
12 papers.
- 2023MAVERIC: A Data-Driven Approach to Personalized Autonomous Drivingcited by 22
- 2022PATO: Policy Assisted TeleOperation for Scalable Robot Data Collectioncited by 19
- 2022Unified Learning from Demonstrations, Corrections, and Preferences during Physical Human-Robot Interactioncited by 18
- 2024Assessment and manipulation of latent constructs in pre-trained language models using psychometric scalescited by 7
- 2021Improving Robot-Centric Learning from Demonstration via Personalized Embeddingscited by 2
- 2025Socratic: Enhancing Human Teamwork via AI-enabled Coachingcited by 2
- 2022Development and Evaluation of a Learning-based Model for Real-time Haptic Texture Renderingcited by 1
- 2023Comparing Psychometric and Behavioral Predictors of Compliance During Human-AI Interactionscited by 1
- 2024Towards Equitable Agile Research and Development of AI and Roboticscited by 1
- 2024Demonstration Based Explainable AI for Learning from Demonstration Methodscited by 1
- 2022Towards Formalizing HRI Data Collection Processescited by 0
- 2024Singing the Body Electric: The Impact of Robot Embodiment on User Expectationscited by 0
- 2025Socratic: Enhancing Human Teamwork via AI-enabled Coaching24 Feb 2025
- 2024Demonstration Based Explainable AI for Learning from Demonstration Methods8 Oct 2024
- 2024Assessment and manipulation of latent constructs in pre-trained language models using psychometric scales29 Sep 2024
- 2024Towards Equitable Agile Research and Development of AI and Robotics13 Feb 2024
- 2024Singing the Body Electric: The Impact of Robot Embodiment on User Expectations13 Jan 2024
- 2023Comparing Psychometric and Behavioral Predictors of Compliance During Human-AI Interactions3 Feb 2023
- 2023MAVERIC: A Data-Driven Approach to Personalized Autonomous Driving20 Jan 2023
- 2022Development and Evaluation of a Learning-based Model for Real-time Haptic Texture Rendering27 Dec 2022
- 2022PATO: Policy Assisted TeleOperation for Scalable Robot Data Collection9 Dec 2022
- 2022Unified Learning from Demonstrations, Corrections, and Preferences during Physical Human-Robot Interaction7 Jul 2022
- 2022Towards Formalizing HRI Data Collection Processes16 Mar 2022
- 2021Improving Robot-Centric Learning from Demonstration via Personalized Embeddings7 Oct 2021