QuickLAP: Quick Language-Action Preference Learning for Semi-Autonomous Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Reinforcement learning for LLM agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Robots must learn from both what people do and what they say, but either modality alone is often incomplete: physical corrections are grounded but ambiguous in intent, while language expresses high-level goals but lacks physical grounding. We introduce QuickLAP: Quick Language-Action Preference learning, a Bayesian framework that fuses physical and language feedback to infer reward functions in real time. Our key insight is to treat language as a probabilistic observation over the user's latent preferences, clarifying which reward features matter and how physical corrections should be interpreted. QuickLAP uses Large Language Models (LLMs) to extract reward feature attention masks and preference shifts from free-form utterances, which it integrates with physical feedback in a closed-form update rule. This enables fast, real-time, and robust reward learning that handles ambiguous feedback. In a semi-autonomous driving simulator, QuickLAP reduces reward learning error by over 70% compared to physical-only and heuristic multimodal baselines. A 15-participant user study further validates our approach: participants found QuickLAP significantly more understandable and collaborative, and preferred its learned behavior over baselines. Code is available at https://github.com/MIT-CLEAR-Lab/QuickLAP.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for LLM agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 45 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2025.
Builds on
45 of 76 references.
References · 45
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 4,057
- 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,863
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
- 2022Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agentscited by 1,035
- 2020robosuite: A Modular Simulation Framework and Benchmark for Robot Learningcited by 511
- 2023Robots That Ask For Help: Uncertainty Alignment for Large Language Model Plannerscited by 308
- 2021PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-trainingcited by 302
- 2022Interactive Language: Talking to Robots in Real Timecited by 218
- 2020Language Conditioned Imitation Learning over Unstructured Datacited by 209
- 2017Interactive Learning from Policy-Dependent Human Feedbackcited by 158
- 2020Language-Conditioned Imitation Learning for Robot Manipulation Taskscited by 136
33 more
- 2022Safe Planning in Dynamic Environments using Conformal Predictioncited by 119
- 2021Core Challenges of Social Robot Navigation: A Surveycited by 106
- 2019Asking Easy Questions: A User-Friendly Approach to Active Reward Learningcited by 68
- 2023"No, to the Right" -- Online Language Corrections for Robotic Manipulation via Shared Autonomycited by 60
- 2020Learning Rewards from Linguistic Feedbackcited by 41
- 2022LATTE: LAnguage Trajectory TransformErcited by 40
- 2020The EMPATHIC Framework for Task Learning from Implicit Human Feedbackcited by 38
- 2018Learning a Prior over Intent via Meta-Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 36
- 2016Learning Preferences for Manipulation Tasks from Online Coactive Feedbackcited by 31
- 2021LILA: Language-Informed Latent Actionscited by 27
- 2020Quantifying Hypothesis Space Misspecification in Learning from Human-Robot Demonstrations and Physical Correctionscited by 19
- 2021Physical Interaction as Communication: Learning Robot Objectives Online from Human Correctionscited by 19
- 2022Unified Learning from Demonstrations, Corrections, and Preferences during Physical Human-Robot Interactioncited by 19
- 2024Trajectory Improvement and Reward Learning from Comparative Language Feedbackcited by 17
- 2021Situational Confidence Assistance for Lifelong Shared Autonomycited by 15
- 2018Learning under Misspecified Objective Spacescited by 14
- 2024Preference-Conditioned Language-Guided Abstractioncited by 12
- 2024ViSaRL: Visual Reinforcement Learning Guided by Human Saliencycited by 12
- 2024Adaptive Language-Guided Abstraction from Contrastive Explanationscited by 8
- 2025The Sense of Agency in Assistive Robotics Using Shared Autonomycited by 8
- 2022Modeling Human Response to Robot Errors for Timely Error Detectioncited by 7
- 2025FEAST: A Flexible Mealtime-Assistance System Towards In-the-Wild Personalizationcited by 7
- 2022Teaching Robots to Span the Space of Functional Expressive Motioncited by 6
- 2024Conformalized Teleoperation: Confidently Mapping Human Inputs to High-Dimensional Robot Actionscited by 6
- 2021Personalizing User Engagement Dynamics in a Non-Verbal Communication Game for Cerebral Palsycited by 4
- 2021Learning to Follow Language Instructions with Compositional Policiescited by 3
- 2024REACT: Two Datasets for Analyzing Both Human Reactions and Evaluative Feedback to Robots Over Timecited by 3
- 2024Automated Assessment and Adaptive Multimodal Formative Feedback Improves Psychomotor Skills Training Outcomes in Quadrotor Teleoperationcited by 3
- 2025Contrastive Learning from Exploratory Actions: Leveraging Natural Interactions for Preference Elicitationcited by 3
- 2025REALM: Real-Time Estimates of Assistance for Learned Models in Human-Robot Interactioncited by 3
- 2025LAMS: LLM-Driven Automatic Mode Switching for Assistive Teleoperationcited by 2
- 2025Help or Hindrance: Understanding the Impact of Robot Communication in Action Teamscited by 2
- 2024Improving User Experience in Preference-Based Optimization of Reward Functions for Assistive Robotscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025LAPP: Large Language Model Feedback for Preference-Driven Reinforcement Learning
- 2025VARP: Reinforcement Learning from Vision-Language Model Feedback with Agent Regularized Preferences
- 2024PREDILECT: Preferences Delineated with Zero-Shot Language-based Reasoning in Reinforcement Learning
- 2024Video-Language Critic: Transferable Reward Functions for Language-Conditioned Robotics
- 2026Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: A Statistical Perspective
- 2026Freeform Preference Learning for Robotic Manipulation
- 2024PrefMMT: Modeling Human Preferences in Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with Multimodal Transformers
- 2026Same Trajectory, Contradictory Rewards (ROBORMBENCH): Paraphrase Fragility in Vision Language Reward Models