BMX: Boosting Natural Language Generation Metrics with Explainability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
State-of-the-art natural language generation evaluation metrics are based on black-box language models. Hence, recent works consider their explainability with the goals of better understandability for humans and better metric analysis, including failure cases. In contrast, our proposed method BMX: Boosting Natural Language Generation Metrics with explainability explicitly leverages explanations to boost the metrics' performance. In particular, we perceive feature importance explanations as word-level scores, which we convert, via power means, into a segment-level score. We then combine this segment-level score with the original metric to obtain a better metric. Our tests show improvements for multiple metrics across MT and summarization datasets. While improvements in machine translation are small, they are strong for summarization. Notably, BMX with the LIME explainer and preselected parameters achieves an average improvement of 0.087 points in Spearman correlation on the system-level evaluation of SummEval.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2022.
Builds on
23 of 50 references.
References · 23
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2018XNLI: Evaluating Cross-lingual Sentence Representationscited by 913
- 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
- 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 666
- 2020Making Monolingual Sentence Embeddings Multilingual using Knowledge Distillationcited by 591
- 2020BERT-ATTACK: Adversarial Attack Against BERT Using BERTcited by 488
- 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 333
- 2016Understanding Neural Networks through Representation Erasurecited by 223
- 2022CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 205
11 more
- 2020Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?cited by 189
- 2020Re-evaluating Evaluation in Text Summarizationcited by 144
- 2021A Statistical Analysis of Summarization Evaluation Metrics using Resampling Methodscited by 71
- 2020TransQuest: Translation Quality Estimation with Cross-lingual Transformerscited by 59
- 2021Perturbation CheckLists for Evaluating NLG Evaluation Metricscited by 49
- 2020MLQE-PE: A Multilingual Quality Estimation and Post-Editing Datasetcited by 47
- 2020Interpretation of NLP models through input marginalizationcited by 43
- 2017Replicability Analysis for Natural Language Processing: Testing Significance with Multiple Datasetscited by 32
- 2021The Eval4NLP Shared Task on Explainable Quality Estimation: Overview and Resultscited by 27
- 2021An Exploratory Analysis of Multilingual Word-Level Quality Estimation with Cross-Lingual Transformerscited by 18
- 2022USCORE: An Effective Approach to Fully Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Machine Translationcited by 15
Built on by
Not cited yet.