mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reproducibility Issues for BERT-based Evaluation Metrics

arXiv 2204.00004 ↗First posted 30 Mar 2022cs.CL cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reproducibility is of utmost concern in machine learning and natural language processing (NLP). In the field of natural language generation (especially machine translation), the seminal paper of Post (2018) has pointed out problems of reproducibility of the dominant metric, BLEU, at the time of publication. Nowadays, BERT-based evaluation metrics considerably outperform BLEU. In this paper, we ask whether results and claims from four recent BERT-based metrics can be reproduced. We find that reproduction of claims and results often fails because of (i) heavy undocumented preprocessing involved in the metrics, (ii) missing code and (iii) reporting weaker results for the baseline metrics. (iv) In one case, the problem stems from correlating not to human scores but to a wrong column in the csv file, inflating scores by 5 points. Motivated by the impact of preprocessing, we then conduct a second study where we examine its effects more closely (for one of the metrics). We find that preprocessing can have large effects, especially for highly inflectional languages. In this case, the effect of preprocessing may be larger than the effect of the aggregation mechanism (e.g., greedy alignment vs. Word Mover Distance).

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2022.

Builds on

29 of 75 references.

References · 29

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  3. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  4. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
  5. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
  6. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  7. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  8. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
  9. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 820
  10. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
  11. 2020Making Monolingual Sentence Embeddings Multilingual using Knowledge Distillationcited by 591
  12. 2019MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distancecited by 415
17 more
  1. 2017Why We Need New Evaluation Metrics for NLGcited by 232
  2. 2020Unsupervised Quality Estimation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 210
  3. 2020Tangled up in BLEU: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation Metricscited by 155
  4. 2022Repairing the Cracked Foundation: A Survey of Obstacles in Evaluation Practices for Generated Textcited by 154
  5. 2015Semantically Conditioned LSTM-based Natural Language Generation for Spoken Dialogue Systemscited by 134
  6. 2021Scientific Credibility of Machine Translation Research: A Meta-Evaluation of 769 Paperscited by 70
  7. 2018Learning to Evaluate Image Captioningcited by 53
  8. 2020Inducing Language-Agnostic Multilingual Representationscited by 48
  9. 2020MLQE-PE: A Multilingual Quality Estimation and Post-Editing Datasetcited by 47
  10. 2021Automatic Text Evaluation through the Lens of Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 38
  11. 2020On the Limitations of Cross-lingual Encoders as Exposed by Reference-Free Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 36
  12. 2021A Systematic Review of Reproducibility Research in Natural Language Processingcited by 34
  13. 2018Concatenated Power Mean Word Embeddings as Universal Cross-Lingual Sentence Representationscited by 20
  14. 2022USCORE: An Effective Approach to Fully Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Machine Translationcited by 15
  15. 2022Towards Explainable Evaluation Metrics for Natural Language Generationcited by 15
  16. 2022RoMe: A Robust Metric for Evaluating Natural Language Generationcited by 6
  17. 2020Improving Text Generation Evaluation with Batch Centering and Tempered Word Mover Distancecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

9 papers.