mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Unified attacks to large language model watermarks: spoofing and scrubbing in unauthorized knowledge distillation

arXiv 2504.17480 ↗First posted 24 Apr 2025cs.CLcited by 11

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Watermarking has emerged as a critical technique for combating misinformation and protecting intellectual property in large language models (LLMs). A recent discovery, termed watermark radioactivity, reveals that watermarks embedded in teacher models can be inherited by student models through knowledge distillation. On the positive side, this inheritance allows for the detection of unauthorized knowledge distillation by identifying watermark traces in student models. However, the robustness of watermarks against scrubbing attacks and their unforgeability in the face of spoofing attacks under unauthorized knowledge distillation remain largely unexplored. Existing watermark attack methods either assume access to model internals or fail to simultaneously support both scrubbing and spoofing attacks. In this work, we propose Contrastive Decoding-Guided Knowledge Distillation (CDG-KD), a unified framework that enables bidirectional attacks under unauthorized knowledge distillation. Our approach employs contrastive decoding to extract corrupted or amplified watermark texts via comparing outputs from the student model and weakly watermarked references, followed by bidirectional distillation to train new student models capable of watermark removal and watermark forgery, respectively. Extensive experiments show that CDG-KD effectively performs attacks while preserving the general performance of the distilled model. Our findings underscore critical need for developing watermarking schemes that are robust and unforgeable.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 44 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2025.

Builds on

44 of 62 references.

Closest ancestors · 20

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Can LLM Watermarks Robustly Prevent Unauthorized Knowledge Distillation?17 Feb
  2. 2025BiMarker: Enhancing Text Watermark Detection for Large Language Models with Bipolar Watermarks21 Jan
  3. 2024Bileve: Securing Text Provenance in Large Language Models Against Spoofing with Bi-level Signature4 Jun
  4. 2024MarkLLM: An Open-Source Toolkit for LLM Watermarking16 May
  5. 2024Watermark Stealing in Large Language Models29 Feb
  6. 2024Token-Specific Watermarking with Enhanced Detectability and Semantic Coherence for Large Language Models28 Feb
  7. 2024Watermarking Makes Language Models Radioactive22 Feb
  8. 2024k-SemStamp: A Clustering-Based Semantic Watermark for Detection of Machine-Generated Text17 Feb
  9. 2023On the Learnability of Watermarks for Language Models7 Dec
  10. 2023A Resilient and Accessible Distribution-Preserving Watermark for Large Language Models11 Oct
  11. 2023A Semantic Invariant Robust Watermark for Large Language Models10 Oct
  12. 2023Unbiased Watermark for Large Language Models22 Sep
8 more
  1. 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Models28 Jul
  2. 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Text30 Jun
  3. 2023On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language Models7 Jun
  4. 2023Undetectable Watermarks for Language Models25 May
  5. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defense23 Mar
  6. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?17 Mar
  7. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Models24 Jan
  8. 2021Protecting Intellectual Property of Language Generation APIs with Lexical Watermark5 Dec

Other references · 24

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  4. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  5. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  6. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
  7. 2019PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 1,102
  8. 2023Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decodingcited by 688
  9. 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 609
  10. 2023Catastrophic Jailbreak of Open-source LLMs via Exploiting Generationcited by 451
  11. 2021DExperts: Decoding-Time Controlled Text Generation with Experts and Anti-Expertscited by 441
  12. 2024LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoderscited by 404
12 more
  1. 2024tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examplescited by 310
  2. 2022On Second Thought, Let's Not Think Step by Step! Bias and Toxicity in Zero-Shot Reasoningcited by 194
  3. 2023Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?cited by 177
  4. 2023On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Modelscited by 128
  5. 2023Alleviating Hallucinations of Large Language Models through Induced Hallucinationscited by 79
  6. 2020Radioactive data: tracing through trainingcited by 67
  7. 2024LLM-Based Test-Driven Interactive Code Generation: User Study and Empirical Evaluationcited by 49
  8. 2024Emulated Disalignment: Safety Alignment for Large Language Models May Backfire!cited by 37
  9. 2025Idiosyncrasies in Large Language Modelscited by 33
  10. 2024Generative News Recommendationcited by 10
  11. 2024Knowledge-Aware Code Generation with Large Language Modelscited by 6
  12. 2025Peering Behind the Shield: Guardrail Identification in Large Language Modelscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 8.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025DITTO: A Spoofing Attack Framework on Watermarked LLMs via Knowledge Distillation
  2. 2024Provably Robust Watermarks for Open-Source Language Models
  3. 2024WaterPool: A Watermark Mitigating Trade-offs among Imperceptibility, Efficacy and Robustness
  4. 2025Defending LLM Watermarking Against Spoofing Attacks with Contrastive Representation Learning
  5. 2024Discovering Spoofing Attempts on Language Model Watermarks
  6. 2025Leave No TRACE: Black-box Detection of Copyrighted Dataset Usage in Large Language Models via Watermarking
  7. 2024Can Watermarking Large Language Models Prevent Copyrighted Text Generation and Hide Training Data?
  8. 2026Language Model Fingerprinting Requires Rethinking Watermark Teachers