mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Auditing Test To Detect Behavioral Shift in Language Models

arXiv 2410.19406 ↗First posted 25 Oct 2024cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As language models (LMs) approach human-level performance, a comprehensive understanding of their behavior becomes crucial. This includes evaluating capabilities, biases, task performance, and alignment with societal values. Extensive initial evaluations, including red teaming and diverse benchmarking, can establish a model's behavioral profile. However, subsequent fine-tuning or deployment modifications may alter these behaviors in unintended ways. We present a method for continual Behavioral Shift Auditing (BSA) in LMs. Building on recent work in hypothesis testing, our auditing test detects behavioral shifts solely through model generations. Our test compares model generations from a baseline model to those of the model under scrutiny and provides theoretical guarantees for change detection while controlling false positives. The test features a configurable tolerance parameter that adjusts sensitivity to behavioral changes for different use cases. We evaluate our approach using two case studies: monitoring changes in (a) toxicity and (b) translation performance. We find that the test is able to detect meaningful changes in behavior distributions using just hundreds of examples.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 84 of its 115 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2024.

Builds on

84 of 115 references.

References · 84

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
  3. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
  4. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  5. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  6. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  7. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  8. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
  9. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
  10. 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,326
  11. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  12. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,239
38 more
  1. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
  2. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,106
  3. 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,002
  4. 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 988
  5. 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 983
  6. 2024Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technologycited by 889
  7. 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 858
  8. 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 828
  9. 2022Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluationscited by 805
  10. 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 755
  11. 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 705
  12. 2020CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Modelscited by 703
  13. 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 702
  14. 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 696
  15. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 667
  16. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 657
  17. 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 505
  18. 2023Benchmarking Large Language Models for News Summarizationcited by 444
  19. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 420
  20. 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 405
  21. 2018HiDDeN: Hiding Data With Deep Networkscited by 384
  22. 2020Weight Poisoning Attacks on Pre-trained Modelscited by 318
  23. 2022Deduplicating Training Data Mitigates Privacy Risks in Language Modelscited by 309
  24. 2024Aya Model: An Instruction Finetuned Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 292
  25. 2021Unsolved Problems in ML Safetycited by 291
  26. 2023The Stable Signature: Rooting Watermarks in Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 289
  27. 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 279
  28. 2019Predicting the Type and Target of Offensive Posts in Social Mediacited by 268
  29. 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Modelscited by 266
  30. 2023AI Alignment: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 256
  31. 2023FacTool: Factuality Detection in Generative AI -- A Tool Augmented Framework for Multi-Task and Multi-Domain Scenarioscited by 247
  32. 2022The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning Perspectivecited by 246
  33. 2024OR-Bench: An Over-Refusal Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 222
  34. 2018Time-uniform, nonparametric, nonasymptotic confidence sequencescited by 220
  35. 2020Learning from the Worst: Dynamically Generated Datasets to Improve Online Hate Detectioncited by 217
  36. 2023A Stitch in Time Saves Nine: Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations of LLMs by Validating Low-Confidence Generationcited by 202
  37. 2023Gender bias and stereotypes in Large Language Modelscited by 185
  38. 2022A New Generation of Perspective API: Efficient Multilingual Character-level Transformerscited by 181

50 most cited of 84 All 84 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 6.

8 papers.