mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DAWN: Dynamic Adversarial Watermarking of Neural Networks

arXiv 1906.00830 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2019cs.CR stat.MLcited by 94

Not on the map. Why?

Cited by 25 in LLM safety and security, but placed by its own abstract, which didn’t fit.

Abstract (arXiv)

Training machine learning (ML) models is expensive in terms of computational power, amounts of labeled data and human expertise. Thus, ML models constitute intellectual property (IP) and business value for their owners. Embedding digital watermarks during model training allows a model owner to later identify their models in case of theft or misuse. However, model functionality can also be stolen via model extraction, where an adversary trains a surrogate model using results returned from a prediction API of the original model. Recent work has shown that model extraction is a realistic threat. Existing watermarking schemes are ineffective against IP theft via model extraction since it is the adversary who trains the surrogate model. In this paper, we introduce DAWN (Dynamic Adversarial Watermarking of Neural Networks), the first approach to use watermarking to deter model extraction IP theft. Unlike prior watermarking schemes, DAWN does not impose changes to the training process but it operates at the prediction API of the protected model, by dynamically changing the responses for a small subset of queries (e.g., <0.5%) from API clients. This set is a watermark that will be embedded in case a client uses its queries to train a surrogate model. We show that DAWN is resilient against two state-of-the-art model extraction attacks, effectively watermarking all extracted surrogate models, allowing model owners to reliably demonstrate ownership (with confidence >1- 2-64), incurring negligible loss of prediction accuracy (0.03-0.5%).

Key facts. Cited by 94 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 11; 2022: 18; 2023: 24; 2024: 21; 2025: 8; 2026: 12.

94 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023The False Promise of Imitating Proprietary LLMscited by 254
  2. 2023A Recipe for Watermarking Diffusion Modelscited by 136
  3. 2023M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 118
  4. 2021Protecting Intellectual Property of Language Generation APIs with Lexical Watermarkcited by 78
  5. 2022I Know What You Trained Last Summer: A Survey on Stealing Machine Learning Models and Defencescited by 75
  6. 2021SoK: How Robust is Image Classification Deep Neural Network Watermarking? (Extended Version)cited by 67
  7. 2023Are You Copying My Model? Protecting the Copyright of Large Language Models for EaaS via Backdoor Watermarkcited by 61
  8. 2022Fingerprinting Deep Neural Networks Globally via Universal Adversarial Perturbationscited by 58
  9. 2022Certified Neural Network Watermarks with Randomized Smoothingcited by 39
  10. 2021MEGEX: Data-Free Model Extraction Attack against Gradient-Based Explainable AIcited by 35
  11. 2023A Survey on ChatGPT: AI-Generated Contents, Challenges, and Solutionscited by 34
  12. 2022The Ethical Need for Watermarks in Machine-Generated Languagecited by 30
38 more
  1. 2022Distillation-Resistant Watermarking for Model Protection in NLPcited by 29
  2. 2023Model Leeching: An Extraction Attack Targeting LLMscited by 22
  3. 2022Increasing the Cost of Model Extraction with Calibrated Proof of Workcited by 21
  4. 2022How to Steer Your Adversary: Targeted and Efficient Model Stealing Defenses with Gradient Redirectioncited by 21
  5. 2023Rethinking White-Box Watermarks on Deep Learning Models under Neural Structural Obfuscationcited by 20
  6. 2024Watermarking Techniques for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 20
  7. 2023Stealing the Decoding Algorithms of Language Modelscited by 19
  8. 2024Double-I Watermark: Protecting Model Copyright for LLM Fine-tuningcited by 18
  9. 2023False Claims against Model Ownership Resolutioncited by 17
  10. 2023Intellectual Property Protection of Diffusion Models via the Watermark Diffusion Processcited by 17
  11. 2023GrOVe: Ownership Verification of Graph Neural Networks using Embeddingscited by 16
  12. 2024MEA-Defender: A Robust Watermark against Model Extraction Attackcited by 16
  13. 2022Watermarking in Secure Federated Learning: A Verification Framework Based on Client-Side Backdooringcited by 14
  14. 2022Conflicting Interactions Among Protection Mechanisms for Machine Learning Modelscited by 12
  15. 2021AdvParams: An Active DNN Intellectual Property Protection Technique via Adversarial Perturbation Based Parameter Encryptioncited by 11
  16. 2022On the Effectiveness of Dataset Watermarking in Adversarial Settingscited by 11
  17. 2023Identifying Appropriate Intellectual Property Protection Mechanisms for Machine Learning Models: A Systematization of Watermarking, Fingerprinting, Model Access, and Attackscited by 11
  18. 2023Watermarking Vision-Language Pre-trained Models for Multi-modal Embedding as a Servicecited by 11
  19. 2024Safe-SD: Safe and Traceable Stable Diffusion with Text Prompt Trigger for Invisible Generative Watermarkingcited by 11
  20. 2021SHAPr: An Efficient and Versatile Membership Privacy Risk Metric for Machine Learningcited by 10
  21. 2023Wide Flat Minimum Watermarking for Robust Ownership Verification of GANscited by 10
  22. 2024Reliable Model Watermarking: Defending Against Theft without Compromising on Evasioncited by 9
  23. 2024Ungeneralizable Examplescited by 9
  24. 2022A Survey on XAI for 5G and Beyond Security: Technical Aspects, Challenges and Research Directionscited by 8
  25. 2022On the Robustness of Dataset Inferencecited by 8
  26. 2021Robust Black-box Watermarking for Deep NeuralNetwork using Inverse Document Frequencycited by 6
  27. 2022Careful What You Wish For: on the Extraction of Adversarially Trained Modelscited by 6
  28. 2023SoK: Unintended Interactions among Machine Learning Defenses and Riskscited by 6
  29. 2024GenAI Content Detection Task 2: AI vs. Human -- Academic Essay Authenticity Challengecited by 6
  30. 2022Cracking White-box DNN Watermarks via Invariant Neuron Transformscited by 5
  31. 2024Can LLMs be Fooled? Investigating Vulnerabilities in LLMscited by 5
  32. 2025Confidential LLM Inference: Performance and Cost Across CPU and GPU TEEscited by 5
  33. 2021Privacy Inference Attacks and Defenses in Cloud-based Deep Neural Network: A Surveycited by 4
  34. 2022DynaMarks: Defending Against Deep Learning Model Extraction Using Dynamic Watermarkingcited by 4
  35. 2024Fortify Your Foundations: Practical Privacy and Security for Foundation Model Deployments In The Cloudcited by 4
  36. 2021Good Artists Copy, Great Artists Steal: Model Extraction Attacks Against Image Translation Modelscited by 3
  37. 2022TATTOOED: A Robust Deep Neural Network Watermarking Scheme based on Spread-Spectrum Channel Codingcited by 3
  38. 2023FDINet: Protecting against DNN Model Extraction via Feature Distortion Indexcited by 3

50 most cited of 94 All 94 (JSON)