mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Copycat CNN: Stealing Knowledge by Persuading Confession with Random Non-Labeled Data

arXiv 1806.05476 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2018cs.CV stat.MLcited by 70

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the past few years, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have been achieving state-of-the-art performance on a variety of problems. Many companies employ resources and money to generate these models and provide them as an API, therefore it is in their best interest to protect them, i.e., to avoid that someone else copies them. Recent studies revealed that state-of-the-art CNNs are vulnerable to adversarial examples attacks, and this weakness indicates that CNNs do not need to operate in the problem domain (PD). Therefore, we hypothesize that they also do not need to be trained with examples of the PD in order to operate in it. Given these facts, in this paper, we investigate if a target black-box CNN can be copied by persuading it to confess its knowledge through random non-labeled data. The copy is two-fold: i) the target network is queried with random data and its predictions are used to create a fake dataset with the knowledge of the network; and ii) a copycat network is trained with the fake dataset and should be able to achieve similar performance as the target network. This hypothesis was evaluated locally in three problems (facial expression, object, and crosswalk classification) and against a cloud-based API. In the copy attacks, images from both non-problem domain and PD were used. All copycat networks achieved at least 93.7% of the performance of the original models with non-problem domain data, and at least 98.6% using additional data from the PD. Additionally, the copycat CNN successfully copied at least 97.3% of the performance of the Microsoft Azure Emotion API. Our results show that it is possible to create a copycat CNN by simply querying a target network as black-box with random non-labeled data.

Key facts. Cited by 70 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 13; 2022: 15; 2023: 20; 2024: 8; 2025: 8; 2026: 6.

70 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Dataset Inference: Ownership Resolution in Machine Learningcited by 116
  2. 2021Proof-of-Learning: Definitions and Practicecited by 84
  3. 2021Protecting Intellectual Property of Language Generation APIs with Lexical Watermarkcited by 84
  4. 2022I Know What You Trained Last Summer: A Survey on Stealing Machine Learning Models and Defencescited by 75
  5. 2022Towards Data-Free Model Stealing in a Hard Label Settingcited by 58
  6. 2021Copy, Right? A Testing Framework for Copyright Protection of Deep Learning Modelscited by 46
  7. 2021Survey: Leakage and Privacy at Inference Timecited by 44
  8. 2021DeepSteal: Advanced Model Extractions Leveraging Efficient Weight Stealing in Memoriescited by 42
  9. 2022Distillation-Resistant Watermarking for Model Protection in NLPcited by 30
  10. 2021Single-Layer Vision Transformers for More Accurate Early Exits with Less Overheadcited by 26
  11. 2022StolenEncoder: Stealing Pre-trained Encoders in Self-supervised Learningcited by 23
  12. 2022Increasing the Cost of Model Extraction with Calibrated Proof of Workcited by 21
38 more
  1. 2023Model Extraction Attacks Revisitedcited by 21
  2. 2023False Claims against Model Ownership Resolutioncited by 17
  3. 2023IronForge: An Open, Secure, Fair, Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 15
  4. 2022On the Effectiveness of Dataset Watermarking in Adversarial Settingscited by 12
  5. 2022Conflicting Interactions Among Protection Mechanisms for Machine Learning Modelscited by 12
  6. 2023Marich: A Query-efficient Distributionally Equivalent Model Extraction Attack using Public Datacited by 11
  7. 2023Watermarking Vision-Language Pre-trained Models for Multi-modal Embedding as a Servicecited by 11
  8. 2021Morphence: Moving Target Defense Against Adversarial Examplescited by 9
  9. 2022Threat Assessment in Machine Learning based Systemscited by 9
  10. 2024QUEEN: Query Unlearning against Model Extractioncited by 9
  11. 2021Stateful Detection of Model Extraction Attackscited by 8
  12. 2023Robust and IP-Protecting Vertical Federated Learning against Unexpected Quitting of Partiescited by 7
  13. 2024QuantumLeak: Stealing Quantum Neural Networks from Cloud-based NISQ Machinescited by 7
  14. 2021Don't Knock! Rowhammer at the Backdoor of DNN Modelscited by 6
  15. 2022Careful What You Wish For: on the Extraction of Adversarially Trained Modelscited by 6
  16. 2023MeaeQ: Mount Model Extraction Attacks with Efficient Queriescited by 6
  17. 2023Army of Thieves: Enhancing Black-Box Model Extraction via Ensemble based sample selectioncited by 6
  18. 2023SoK: Unintended Interactions among Machine Learning Defenses and Riskscited by 6
  19. 2023Model Extraction Attacks on Split Federated Learningcited by 5
  20. 2024DeepEclipse: How to Break White-Box DNN-Watermarking Schemescited by 5
  21. 2023Beyond Labeling Oracles: What does it mean to steal ML models?cited by 4
  22. 2025CopyQNN: Quantum Neural Network Extraction Attack under Varying Quantum Noisecited by 4
  23. 2021Copycat CNN: Are Random Non-Labeled Data Enough to Steal Knowledge from Black-box Models?cited by 3
  24. 2021Good Artists Copy, Great Artists Steal: Model Extraction Attacks Against Image Translation Modelscited by 3
  25. 2021HODA: Hardness-Oriented Detection of Model Extraction Attackscited by 3
  26. 2022Adversarial Machine Learning Threat Analysis and Remediation in Open Radio Access Network (O-RAN)cited by 3
  27. 2023PromptMix: Text-to-image diffusion models enhance the performance of lightweight networkscited by 3
  28. 2023FDINet: Protecting against DNN Model Extraction via Feature Distortion Indexcited by 3
  29. 2023The Power of MEME: Adversarial Malware Creation with Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
  30. 2026Let Them Steal: Trapping Large Language Model Extraction Attacks with Knowledge Honeypotcited by 3
  31. 2022Morphence-2.0: Evasion-Resilient Moving Target Defense Powered by Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 2
  32. 2023Pareto-Secure Machine Learning (PSML): Fingerprinting and Securing Inference Serving Systemscited by 2
  33. 2023Towards Few-Call Model Stealing via Active Self-Paced Knowledge Distillation and Diffusion-Based Image Generationcited by 2
  34. 2025Examining the Threat Landscape: Foundation Models and Model Stealingcited by 2
  35. 2025Are Neuro-Inspired Multi-Modal Vision-Language Models Resilient to Membership Inference Privacy Leakage?cited by 2
  36. 2022Stealing and Evading Malware Classifiers and Antivirus at Low False Positive Conditionscited by 1
  37. 2023A reading survey on adversarial machine learning: Adversarial attacks and their understandingcited by 1
  38. 2023SODA: Protecting Proprietary Information in On-Device Machine Learning Modelscited by 1

50 most cited of 70 All 70 (JSON)