mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Breaking Down Multilingual Machine Translation

arXiv 2110.08130 ↗First posted 15 Oct 2021cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While multilingual training is now an essential ingredient in machine translation (MT) systems, recent work has demonstrated that it has different effects in different multilingual settings, such as many-to-one, one-to-many, and many-to-many learning. These training settings expose the encoder and the decoder in a machine translation model with different data distributions. In this paper, we examine how different varieties of multilingual training contribute to learning these two components of the MT model. Specifically, we compare bilingual models with encoders and/or decoders initialized by multilingual training. We show that multilingual training is beneficial to encoders in general, while it only benefits decoders for low-resource languages (LRLs). We further find the important attention heads for each language pair and compare their correlations during inference. Our analysis sheds light on how multilingual translation models work and enables us to propose methods to improve performance by training with highly related languages. Our many-to-one models for high-resource languages and one-to-many models for LRL outperform the best results reported by Aharoni et al. (2019)

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2021.

Builds on

26 of 42 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  3. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
  4. 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
  5. 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 844
  6. 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 803
  7. 2019On the Cross-lingual Transferability of Monolingual Representationscited by 575
  8. 2020Beyond English-Centric Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 559
  9. 2016Google's Multilingual Neural Machine Translation System: Enabling Zero-Shot Translationcited by 467
  10. 2020Improving Massively Multilingual Neural Machine Translation and Zero-Shot Translationcited by 277
  11. 2019Massively Multilingual Neural Machine Translation in the Wild: Findings and Challengescited by 253
  12. 2019Massively Multilingual Neural Machine Translationcited by 246
14 more
  1. 2019Leveraging Pre-trained Checkpoints for Sequence Generation Taskscited by 182
  2. 2019Choosing Transfer Languages for Cross-Lingual Learningcited by 143
  3. 2018When and Why are Pre-trained Word Embeddings Useful for Neural Machine Translation?cited by 125
  4. 2016Multi-Way, Multilingual Neural Machine Translation with a Shared Attention Mechanismcited by 117
  5. 2019Do Attention Heads in BERT Track Syntactic Dependencies?cited by 87
  6. 2018Rapid Adaptation of Neural Machine Translation to New Languagescited by 82
  7. 2016Toward Multilingual Neural Machine Translation with Universal Encoder and Decodercited by 76
  8. 2019Investigating Multilingual NMT Representations at Scalecited by 68
  9. 2018Universal Neural Machine Translation for Extremely Low Resource Languagescited by 66
  10. 2018Parameter Sharing Methods for Multilingual Self-Attentional Translation Modelscited by 33
  11. 2018Why Self-Attention? A Targeted Evaluation of Neural Machine Translation Architecturescited by 30
  12. 2020Successfully Applying the Stabilized Lottery Ticket Hypothesis to the Transformer Architecturecited by 23
  13. 2020Bridging Linguistic Typology and Multilingual Machine Translation with Multi-View Language Representationscited by 21
  14. 2018Freezing Subnetworks to Analyze Domain Adaptation in Neural Machine Translationcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

8 papers.