mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Disentangling the Roles of Target-Side Transfer and Regularization in Multilingual Machine Translation

arXiv 2402.01772 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multilingual Machine Translation (MMT) benefits from knowledge transfer across different language pairs. However, improvements in one-to-many translation compared to many-to-one translation are only marginal and sometimes even negligible. This performance discrepancy raises the question of to what extent positive transfer plays a role on the target-side for one-to-many MT. In this paper, we conduct a large-scale study that varies the auxiliary target side languages along two dimensions, i.e., linguistic similarity and corpus size, to show the dynamic impact of knowledge transfer on the main language pairs. We show that linguistically similar auxiliary target languages exhibit strong ability to transfer positive knowledge. With an increasing size of similar target languages, the positive transfer is further enhanced to benefit the main language pairs. Meanwhile, we find distant auxiliary target languages can also unexpectedly benefit main language pairs, even with minimal positive transfer ability. Apart from transfer, we show distant auxiliary target languages can act as a regularizer to benefit translation performance by enhancing the generalization and model inference calibration.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2024.

Builds on

26 of 32 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  4. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  5. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,973
  6. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  7. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
  8. 2016Google's Multilingual Neural Machine Translation System: Enabling Zero-Shot Translationcited by 467
  9. 2020Multilingual Translation with Extensible Multilingual Pretraining and Finetuningcited by 287
  10. 2019Massively Multilingual Neural Machine Translation in the Wild: Findings and Challengescited by 253
  11. 2019Massively Multilingual Neural Machine Translationcited by 246
  12. 2018Characterizing and Avoiding Negative Transfercited by 226
14 more
  1. 2021R-Drop: Regularized Dropout for Neural Networkscited by 202
  2. 2016Transfer Learning for Low-Resource Neural Machine Translationcited by 188
  3. 2018Rapid Adaptation of Neural Machine Translation to New Languagescited by 82
  4. 2019Investigating Multilingual NMT Representations at Scalecited by 68
  5. 2020On the Inference Calibration of Neural Machine Translationcited by 61
  6. 2018Trivial Transfer Learning for Low-Resource Neural Machine Translationcited by 47
  7. 2021Improving Multilingual Translation by Representation and Gradient Regularizationcited by 31
  8. 2022Causes and Cures for Interference in Multilingual Translationcited by 23
  9. 2018Transfer Learning in Multilingual Neural Machine Translation with Dynamic Vocabularycited by 18
  10. 2023Viewing Knowledge Transfer in Multilingual Machine Translation Through a Representational Lenscited by 15
  11. 2020A Comprehensive Survey of Multilingual Neural Machine Translationcited by 12
  12. 2018Addressing word-order Divergence in Multilingual Neural Machine Translation for extremely Low Resource Languagescited by 11
  13. 2021Breaking Down Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 8
  14. 2020Improving Target-side Lexical Transfer in Multilingual Neural Machine Translationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.